flytoox Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 Suppose you play pretty standard precision, i.e., 1C=16+,1N=13-15. What is best (or better) follow-up structure after 1D-2C? Do you rebid 2N with any minimum balanced hand. If you rebid 2M, does it promise shape or extra HCP or just 4D+4M? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 How light are your 1D openings, and how sound is 1D-2N? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytoox Posted May 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 How light are your 1D openings, and how sound is 1D-2N? I personally prefer 1D shows good 11, with either shape or quality cards, say AXXX,XXX,AKXX,XX, I would open with 1D happily. However, I hate opening with KJXX, QXX, KQXX,XX. 1D-2N is invitational, showing 11-12. In my sys, 1D-2C is abosolutely FG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 One more important thing is what do you do with GF hands with 4M - 5m.It's kinda easier to plan subsequent auction if you reply 1M with those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytoox Posted May 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 One more important thing is what do you do with GF hands with 4M - 5m.It's kinda easier to plan subsequent auction if you reply 1M with those. I never do that. I hate it:) and I always bid minor first if I have a good hand and 5m4M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 Meckwell and Greco-Hampson use artificial structure (2♥ is 11-13bal, 2♠ is 4card support + shortness) etc. My feeling is that their choice was dictated by playing not forcing to game 2♣ and 2♦ (thus having 3♣/3♦ bid for weaker hands) because they need a way to bid with both invitational and GF hands and 2♠ relay after 2♥ response allows for that. I also feel that in their system you really should bid 1♥/1♠ with 5♣-4M and less than slam invitational hands.If those are forcing to game in your system I think you can get away with much simpler solution (and not having those "ugly" canape in your structure) I would go with this basic scheme: 2♦ = 5+diamonds2♥/2♠ = natural 4+, without 5♦2NT = balanced without 4card major3♣ = minimum but 4card ♣ support unbal3♥/3♠ splinters with ♣ support (4+) Now in sequence: 1♦ - 2♣2♦ - 2♥/2♠ are 3rd suit may be values, may be 4card suit (partner bid 3NT with both 4card support and stopper in 4th suit; raise to 3 without stopper) If you have game forcing hand with clubs and don't have natural 3rd suit to bid you just bid 3♣ (this is a problem if you don't play 2♣ as GF). 1♦ - 2♣2NT - here I feel you may want to use 3♦/3♥/3♠ as shortness with 6♣; You have two free bids 3♦ and 3NT. You may want to assign 4-4-4-1 max hand to 3NT and 2-2-4-5 hand to 3♦ for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.