serapuff Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 ♠K6♥AKQ1063♦AK652 white/red, 4th seat Bidding goes: pass-pass-2C*-X (you)3C - pass - 4C - 4NT (showing 2 suits)pass - 5D- pass - ? How would you bid this? * 2C shows 5+ clubs 10-153C is non constructive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigel_k Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Agree with the bidding so far and would bid 5NT (choice of slams) now. Slam is not certain but I cannot pass when 12 tricks are likely and I haven't shown the full strength of my hand so can't expect partner to bid more than 5♦ on most hands where slam is good. A grand slam try is too much - partner is quite unlikely to have the ♠A and he could well accept without it given that he has shown nothing. Partner has better diamonds than hearts, so 5NT suggests five diamonds and a six card major, allowing us to play 6♥ opposite for example xxxxx xxx Qxx xx. 5♥ also suggests this hand type but slightly weaker and is a non-forcing slam try, maybe the same hand without the ♥Q would bid 5♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Tough problem. I wonder what 5♣ by partner would be, maybe 4234 suggesting he prefers spades if I had spades and diamonds (assuming 3♣ over 2♣ shows both majors)? If that's the case then logically partner doesn't have spade length so maybe he's 3244 or 4144 or 2254? Think I'm just gonna bid 6♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 I still dislike these offshape doubles, we will never come close to describing our hand. 4D if played as leaping michaels or6H with no special agreements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONEferBRID Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 I still dislike these offshape doubles, we will never come close to describing our hand. 4D if played as leaping michaels or6H with no special agreements.Double-jumping to 4D seems like an unnecessary waste of valuable space ( eventho it is much better than the X , then 4NT ). Here is a simplified 2-suiter system I learned some years ago for a weak-2D open, but applying it to the special 2C! open (= to a real suit, opening values ) : 4C = both Majors3H-jump = H/D3S-jump = S/D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - With the OP bidding, where partner shows a preference to Diam, I'd have to go with 6D ...... unfortunately leaving the ♠K x vulnerable to an opening lead assault . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 DAPO/Super MAF uses 2S as 2-suited not Spades, not clubs. Then Q-bid shows slam try/force, even repeat Q-bid here. Partner evaluates very well after that description. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.