jillybean Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 (P) P (P) 1♦(1♠) P (P) 2♥(P) 2N* Playing lebensohl over reverses, how do you play 2N by a passed hand, after the interference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 natural Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 I play 2 NT always as artifical so I will do here. Lebensohl it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Playing 2NT as lebensohl here would be very foolish imo. With good hands you can just bid 2S, and 3D can be NF. 2NT as natural is useful and there is no reason to sacrifice this meaning since the cue is available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Agree with Han here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 2 NT natural?I bite. You passed 1 Spade and now think that 2 NT is a good description of your hand. What kind of hand do you think of? Too weak for 1 NT direct, so lets say 5-6 HCPs in spades and nothing else? I can think of exactly one hand type, something like KJxx, xx, xx,Jxxxx.Partner did not double, so he seems to have at most two clubs. So for 2 NT you need to stop both black suits and you are too weak for a direct 1 Nt and you do not want to pass 2 ♥. A rare bird, isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Sounds about right Codo, 4-6 HCP, spade stopper, no fit. You can have any of these shapes: 432453234225531452155224 Maybe more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted May 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 This was my hand, perhaps some would bid 2♣/(1♠) A9843, 73, 9, AJ743 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 If you didn't then you can now bid 2S and show a GF hand. I would have bid 2C though, you are a passed hand so its not even forcing, perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted May 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 If you didn't then you can now bid 2S and show a GF hand. I would have bid 2C though, you are a passed hand so its not even forcing, perfect. Why do you make a 2♠ GF with this and little hope of a fit. A9843, 73, 9, AJ743 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Partner reversed and we have two aces, I would certainly force to game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 i agree with everything han's said here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 2H is non forcing, and when we are 5-5 in the blacks I expect partner to very likely be 5-6 because the only time he wouldn't reopen X is if he has short clubs and spade length. I suppose 2461 is still possible, but something like 3451 or 3460 is now very unlikely. I would expect partner to reopen with 2H on just about any 5-6 hand, so I think bidding 2N is fine. And in general I think treating this auction like a normal reverse is bad given that partner can reopen X on almost all x45x hands, and that this bid isn't even forcing, and is generally based more on shape than strength (and a combination of the 2). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Let us first figure why opener chose 2H, instead of Dbl, 1NT, or 2S. The answer appears that his hand is too distributional, 6-5 probable and 2-4-6-1 or more extreme not out of the picture. I don't like Lebensohl on by passed hand (twice passed here) and in competition. This is logically one of the rare exceptions to the rule that 2NT in competition cannot be natural. It should be natural here, unless you have already agreed 2NT is always Lebensohl after reverse, passed/unpassed and with/without competition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.