jerryblu Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Playing lebensohl (or Rubensohl similarly), when the bidding goes 1NT-2S, responder with a GF & a stopper and a 4 card heart suit bids 2NT and then cuebids spades. But if the bidding goes 1NT-2S-2NT-3S then what? Opener cant bid because responder might have only a club competitive hand. Responder has two possible bids: dbl and 3NT. That sounds like penalty and a minor oriented gf hand with a stopper. I dont see any easy way to get a third meaning expressed. There are good logical reasons to say that either 3NT or the double should show a heart suit. How do you play it? (The problem does not arise for other suits, because the "other major" can always be bid naturally by responder.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 X shows 4 hearts, 3N shows a 3N bid with a stopper and without hearts. Penalty does not exist. Also I like to play negative doubles so with 4 hearts and a stopper I'd always start wtih X, and with 4 hearts and short spades I would start with a cue. If you played this I guess you could play X = some pen hand and 3N = 3N bid with stopper, but honestly the first hand type doesn't seem that useful. Maybe at MP if you had a goodish 3 of a minor signoff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 It's awfully rare that you will decide NOT to seek a penalty against 2♠, then decide on the next round that you want to nail 3♠. jlall's approach seems the obvious and sensible one. [Edited to add: in the context of off-the-shelf Lebensohl.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straube Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Playing Rubensohl... 1N (2S) 3H shows 4 hearts (w/ or w/out a stopper) and lets opener bid 3S to deny a stopper. After 1N (2S) 3H (3S) opener can pass without a stopper or bid 3N with a stopper. I guess dbl is penalty unless otherwise agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryblu Posted April 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Thanks for the replies. I had hoped for more people to comment, and quite frankly, given the number of variant methods being used, and the way people tend to have strong opinions about these things, I had hoped for some disagreements. Maybe another day or so will bring me more grist for my mill. :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanM Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Like Justin, I play negative DBLs after 1NT-(2X) and also play that a cue bid shows a game force with a splinter in the opponent's suit - immediate cue promises 4 cards in the other Major, 2NT ... cue denies 4 cards in the other major; 2NT ... 3NT denies a stopper. In that context, when they raise, DBL shows that I would have rebid 3NT (the hand where we're most likely want to defend) and 3NT shows that I would have cue-bid (splinter in their suit, so less likely to want to defend). With a hand where I was trying to sign off in 3 of a lower suit, I just pass their raise. Incidentally, I also play transfer Lebensohl and it wouldn't have occurred to me to use 1NT-(2♠)-3♥ as 4 hearts. It would either be the cue-bid or show clubs, if the cue-bid is 3♠. I mention that only because it's a good thing to clarify if you agree to play transfer Lebensohl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.