Phil Posted April 16, 2010 Report Share Posted April 16, 2010 I've never made a leaping Michaels call with a 4-5, but I did it once with a 4♠-6♦, over 2♥ which worked out very poorly. Pard took the Moysian preference to 4M with 3-3 in my suits so 5m would have made but 4♠ was terrible as the hand got tapped immediately. I still like x. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pirate22 Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 No one has a system-----------But one has to take action-No one has said PASS over 2d and await developements so x is 2/3/4 bestI rest our case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 2NT is just an underbid and is therefore clearly inferior to 3NT imo, I don't really understand why one would bid 2NT. 2N gives partner room for stayman/smolen/transfers so it makes it much more likely to find a spade fit. On the other hand, 2N seems like a misbid with a void in a major suit and you're gonna hear texas in hearts a lot imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONEferBRID Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 But then he suggested something no one has advocated - 4♣, showing 5-5 in clubs and a Major. Overstates the spades, of course, but at least it gets across that this is a 2-suited hand. Means we won't be able to play 3NT, but it's not going to be easy to get to 3NT, and will be pretty impossible to get there and know it's right.You still have a 3NT option available using a modified Roman-Jump over a weak-2D open when you want to show a specific Major and Cl -- big 2-suiter : ??3D! = stop-ask for 3NT3H-jump! = Hts and Cl ( partner can still bid 3NT )3S-jump! = Sp and Cl ( " )4D!-jump = both Majors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebiker Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Here is the hand opposite the problem hand 2D ? P ?? ♠QXX♥987XXX♦X♣TXX Both auctions started with a doubleBoth tables ended up in 4H -4 . -200 at one table, -1100 at another 3NT would not make once defence worked out to switch to hearts Spades were 5-1 with a singleton J in the 2D hand Thank you all for your suggestions/theories - A very difficult hand not just for the players at the table, but many others at their keyboards the biker Brian Keable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 3♣ - going plus :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 ++++ woo hoo nah x should also go + btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 X, followed by a club bid. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Seems: (2♦) - x - (p) - 2♥' then: 3♣ - 3♥3♠ - 4♣(pass?) is a reasonable auction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I think partner has to pass 3♣, it looks like his hand is a great dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.