blackshoe Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 If I claim because they are high, then I play the highest first. Then when you claim you should say so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shyams Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 If I claim because they are high, then I play the highest first. Then when you claim you should say so. ... but in this specific example, the claimer said so. Her claim statement included "cash 2 top diamonds", yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
campboy Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 If I claim because they are high, then I play the highest first. Then when you claim you should say so. ... but in this specific example, the claimer said so. Her claim statement included "cash 2 top diamonds", yet... And if she had said "cash two top diamonds, then pitch two clubs on diamonds" I would give her all the tricks. But the line she stated had an impossible play before that, so she would not get that far. When declarer states a line which is impossible, it is normal to evaluate the claim on the basis that she will notice at the point it becomes impossible to follow, and change her line accordingly. This approach normally works to declarer's benefit, but here there are too many "normal" lines and we cannot be sure what she would have done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.