more matchpoints....

[aguahombre]

If I bid 2♦ I might be able to win the postmortem but I'd have to play it there first.

 

May I assume she does not read these fora? Is the doghouse comfortable?

[Jlall]

If I bid 2♦ I might be able to win the postmortem but I'd have to play it there first.

 

May I assume she does not read these fora? Is the doghouse comfortable?

Is it really not obvious that he is just mocking the OP?

 

Edit: Also his gf is known as one of the best women players in the world and would be considered by most (including himself probably) to be a better player than he is heh.

[aguahombre]

Was it not obvious that I knew that?

[gwnn]

No it wasn't (but my reading comprehension is not world class)

To be fair, in a vacuum not even hanp's post would be obvious to me.

[jjbrr]

If I pass there is a chance that 1S= beats 4S-1.

I lol'd at this.

 

Han, you're brilliant.

[wank]

i think it's a tricky problem in any circumstances. i had the responding hand, ironicially given what I said about sexism, but the auction was different at my table.

 

anyway partner's hand is J9xxx Jxxxx x Qx - this was suggested to be a 2D bid, but looks far too weak imo especially minus a mythical king.

 

spades are 4-1 so 4S is off, but 4H makes.

 

the player who actually had the hand is a very good but equally sexist player and passed 1S, but they got to 4H as opener backed in with 2D. personally i would have bid 2D though consider it marginal even in protective. on the other hand, one of my friends, a silver medallist from beijing bid 1NT and considered it a non-problem.

[OleBerg]

1NT rightsiding NT contracts. And I do not feel I'm hogging.

 

My hand is perfect except for my dubious stopper in diamonds.

 

...on the other hand, one of my friends, a silver medallist from beijing bid 1NT and considered it a non-problem.

 

 

Touchdown, the crowd is cheering.

[Jlall]

but looks far too weak imo especially minus a mythical king.

lol