barryallen Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 I've never heard of this. What is the small theoretical advantage? That you more often don't have to waste a high card to signal for any suit? Yes. Or, looking at it another way, you can signal for any suit using a low card. In fact, this applies only if you have a choice of which suit to signal with, so only if you're discarding. I imagine that makes the advantage rather smaller than for UDCA, so maybe my surprise is unwarranted. I would imagine the advantage would be more? You now have a high and a low card to signal the same thing. Sometimes avoiding a possibly valuable high card or baring an honour with a low card. Additionally two discards from a long suit can achieve the same guidance. What really intrigues me is especially on first lead, do players give attitude or count. I have always followed attitude /switch on first lead dependent upon dummy. Interested in those that just use count because I have seen successful players use it in the past. Not talking about an attitude / count signal dependent upon the card led, but count irrespective of the card led. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhare Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 One thing that I find curious: lots of people prefer UDCA to standard because of a small theoretical advantage, but hardly anyone prefers revolving signals* to standard suit preference, even though that too has a small theoretical advantage. * Revolving = low card signals for the next lower suit in rotation; high card signals for the next higher suit in rotation. Aren't revolving discards very similar to Lavinthal? I have played them in the same manner as described, with the extension that the discard of the 5, 6, 7 was "neutral" and carried no message, except that playing 5 -7 up the line in the same suit was mildly encouraging.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted March 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 Thank you all for taking the time to post. Your replies are thoughtful. With that said still not sure what UDCA...expert is. I played often UDCA back in 87 and discussed udca back in 71 but I understand theory moves on...... I guess I was looking for basic answers to questions such as trick one...trick two....first discard...etc... I have not played UDCA for years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.