CSGibson Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Double not only has less than ideal shape, it also lacks four spades, and on top of that it is too long in hearts, additionally it doesn't even have two four card minors. For these 17 reasons I think double is wrong. B) Confusion...slowly dawning...Ahhh, now I get it, those were all the same reason(s), but restated in several different ways...I hope? I need someone to put sarcasm font on these things... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Double not only has less than ideal shape, it also lacks four spades, and on top of that it is too long in hearts, additionally it doesn't even have two four card minors. For these 17 reasons I think double is wrong. B) Confusion...slowly dawning...Ahhh, now I get it, those were all the same reason(s), but restated in several different ways...I hope? I need someone to put sarcasm font on these things...actually, no. They are three separate things. Josh is not beyond Joshing, but this is not one of those times."Ideal"=4-1-4-4, hence less than ideal."4-X-X-X" would be less than ideal but still have four of the focus Major.Having JXX of hearts is a true third flaw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 That's like saying if my proper healthy weight is 160 pounds and I really weigh 190 pounds then there are 3 problems with my weight. That I'm over the ideal weight of 160, and I'm not even under 170 to be close, and that I'm all the way to 190 which is even worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 ♥jdonn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Double not only has less than ideal shape, it also lacks four spades, and on top of that it is too long in hearts, additionally it doesn't even have two four card minors. For these 17 reasons I think double is wrong. <_< Confusion...slowly dawning...Ahhh, now I get it, those were all the same reason(s), but restated in several different ways...I hope? I need someone to put sarcasm font on these things...actually, no. They are three separate things. Josh is not beyond Joshing, but this is not one of those times."Ideal"=4-1-4-4, hence less than ideal."4-X-X-X" would be less than ideal but still have four of the focus Major.Having JXX of hearts is a true third flaw. To be fair, I cheated in my analysis of whether Josh was using sarcasm by looking at his earlier thoughts on this problem, when he clearly said that he thought X was best. My 2nd grade teacher would appreciate my use of context clues in reading comprehension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 No, Gibson, you were right. I made the mistake of thinking he changed his mind and supporting that change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Josh < - > change his mind New to the forums? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Josh < - > change his mind New to the forums? non sequitur? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Josh < - > change his mind New to the forums? Wow so false! I'm hurt... Gwnn please find 10 times I changed my mind :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.