manudude03 Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 [hv=d=w&v=n&s=shkqjxxxd9xxxxcax]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv] Sitting North: (P)-1♥-(4♠)-5♦(6♠)-?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 7♦. How bad can it be with this shape? Let them figure it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 can i lightenr?????????? ok im void in trumps i gotta bid gam eher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mich-b Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 7♦. Who knows how many tricks either side is making? I suspect that it is likely that 7♦ is down 1 , and so is 6♠ , but in case either of them makes , the odds favour bidding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 7♦, is this really a problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 yeah the problem is when aprtner makes a forcing pass over 7♠ :unsure: I think this problem is closer than the others think, partner rates to have ♥A ♦A, but might as well have ♠A and we are off a red one. pass is appealing, if it was understood as forcing, but IMO it should not be. So 7♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 Since RHO is a passed hand I think it is obvious that they are sacrificing so pass is forcing. Anyway, I would bid 7♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manudude03 Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 wow, an unaminous poll, rare breed. Anyway, you were never going to get a great board here, but you could have recovered something by doubling. This was a hand an opp had which seemed interesting. He also bid 7♦ which went 1 off doubled. His partner commented that he should really double 6♠ on the basis there are 2 "likely" tricks which seemed like resulting a little. Anyway, the hands were something along the lines of: [hv=n=shkqjxxxd9xxxxcax&w=sjxxxhtxxdtckjxxx&e=saktxxxxhaxdctxxx&s=sqxhxxdakqjxxxcqx]399|300|[/hv] It was only a 4 table field, 2 were in 6♦ making, 1 EW pair went down 2 in 6♠, while our table was 7♦x-1 for a top for us. The "part 2" was going to be what to lead with the south hand if you do decide to defend 6♠, though since no-one is defending it.... :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.