Jump to content

Hesitating again


bluejak

Recommended Posts

Another query from a correspondent. What do you think?

 

[hv=d=n&v=n&n=sa8hqjt96432d72ck&w=skjt9753hdk83ca65&e=sq2h7daq6cqj97432&s=s64hak85djt954ct8]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

..W...N....E...S

.......3...P...4

.4..5.P#1.P

.5...P....P....P

#1 Agreed hesitation

 

Result 5 +1, NS -480.

 

The TD adjusted this to 5 -3, NS -300.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's clear that W used the UI. For all W knows (without the UI) his partner could have a near zero count and S raised the 3 bid to 4 planning on making it and possibly more. If E did indeed have a zero count then W could be down 4 or 5 in 5. I'd definitely agree with the director's ruling.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would say the pass suggests doubling (clearly just extra after a 4S call), not 5S - partner can have a borderline penaly X in which case 5S is likely converting a plus into a minus. there's no reason to assume partner's supposed defensive values will be sufficient to make 5S or indeed be of any value at all in spades.

 

as such i'd say result stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...