twcho Posted March 20, 2010 Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 IMP, both vul, bidding went:1NT - 2♦ - 3♦ - 4♦X?1NT = 15-172♦ = natural overcall3♦ = stayman with no ♦ stopper How do you interpret this double? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted March 20, 2010 Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 That 4♦ was a mistake.With 4-4 in the majors, opener could bid 4♥ if he wants to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted March 20, 2010 Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 Responder did not guarantee both majors, so it seems opener has to have a way to do that with a double here. There was a string about a week ago which is closely related to this. If the opps have "made a mistake", I think pass is the only way to possibly exact a penalty from partner's double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted March 20, 2010 Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 It's ok to pass with a penalty of 4♦. Responder is bound to be short there and, since he bid 3♦, he sure got the points to bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 Both Ms. Agree with AQH and Nuno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 3♦ is a gameforcing bid in my book, and my usual meta agreement is that all doubles in gameforcing auctions are to defend.Other approaches are possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 3♦ is a gameforcing bid in my book, and my usual meta agreement is that all doubles in gameforcing auctions are to defend.Other approaches are possible. That's what I would think too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlson Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 I play as many takeout doubles as anyone, and it would not occur to me that this one was not penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 Just shows a preference to defend without a 4cM. I've never had a jump on the table penalty double in this situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigel_k Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 I think 4♥ here has to be both majors, otherwise what if opener has only hearts and responder only spades? So I would just play double as penalty and pass with the other hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twcho Posted March 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 So far I have got two main completely opposing views:1. penalty (because this is a forcing situation, double means desire to defend rather than going further).2. take-out (for real penalty, you can pass and pass the partner's possible double). I think both camps have their reasoning but the problem is that when one employ a double, how can he know what interpretation his partner will conceive? So for any serious partnership, there must be some metarules to guide you through undiscussed auction. Can anyone enlighten me for their metarules about the meaning of double? Misunderstanding in this area surely leads to disaster (recent example the Vanderbilt match between HH and FN). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.