Jump to content

whaddya gonna do with all that junk?


Phil

  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. whaddya gonna do with all that junk?

    • Junk: 3C (bad suit / bad hand)
      6
    • Non-Junk: 3H (bad suit / good hand)
      41
    • I would have passed
      4
    • Junk? This is a 1 bid.
      3


Recommended Posts

If not this, then how much stronger is a good hand with a bad suit? :unsure:

 

I don't understand how one could sell a 10-count as a bad hand with a bad suit.

Bad hand = 8 loser

Good hand = 7 loser

 

Bad suit = 1 of top 3 honors

Good suit = 2 of top 3 honors

 

Q9x  AJ7xxx  Qx  Jx = 8 loser hand

 

KQx  AJ7xxx  xx  xx = 7 loser ( Good hand )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3. No reason to make a problem out of this. Our Q, Q, J will often mesh well with partner's values.

I bid 3H and didn't think too much of it but I was maligned by one pair of teammates for doing so. Agree this 'junk' might be useful to partner in 3N.

 

This bad suit / good hand classification could be a lot better: xx AJxxxx KQx xx f/i.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there really people on BBO fora who would not open 1H with 6-3-2-2 hand which includes a KQX and AJXXXX? Those example hands are not possible.

I cannot speak to if there are "people," but I am sure there is "person."

Hey, that's cool. I was actually more making an observation that there are a whole bunch on this site who have advocated strongly a 1-bid with much weaker hands. Perhaps I exaggerated.

 

edit: the people who voted to pass the given OP hand originally or said they would have opened a 1-bid on this junk should probably be considered to be extra votes for 3H on the OP question about rebid after 2NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 is one of the easiest bids on the forums in recent times. You have 10 points and have no idea where partner's values are. Why can't he have 17 and just be looking for enough values for game? This is a real no-brainer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there really people on BBO fora who would not open 1H with 6-3-2-2 hand which includes a KQX and AJXXXX? Those example hands are not possible.

Lots of us. I think 1H can be dangerous in a 2/1 setting.

 

At least I know Hrothgar and Mike777 agree :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use loser count in evaluating hand strength more than almost anyone on this Forum. And I think this is a 3 bid.

 

Partner is supposed to have a good hand for his 2NT bid. My hand will not be a disappointment to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All vul, dealer Q9x AJ7xxx Qx Jx
IMO 1 = 10, 2 = 6, _P = 3, 3 = 1.

Vulnerable, with opening values but a flimsy suit, 1 seems a better option than a pre-empt

2 - 2N - ??
Now 3 = 10, 3 = 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

;) at calling this hand opening values with Qx and Jx in minors and 10 HCP.

 

KNR says 9.45. I wouldn't dream to open 1 here unless playing forcing club with opening 1's being 10-15 and then only since I have a 6 carder.

 

Just my opinion that this is far from an opening 1 bid in a S/A system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my simplistic and overly optimistic approach to open most 10 counts with a 6 card suit on the 1 level. It is not just a question of getting possibly too high etc, it's also the question of what else one can do (passing is risky, we may not be sufficiently hearts-oriented for a weak 2). I do agree that this does not look like a good weak 2 but that's just because it does not look like a weak 2 at all. But if I opened 2H with this I have to bid 3H now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...