New suit superaccept over transfer

[gwnn]

I hope no one minds if I mention that I really don't care for this HHx maximum idea, it almost always gets you too high in my (probably very biased) perception. I was made to play it for a few sessions and whenever it came up it was very bad. I even stopped transferring after a while :rolleyes:

[lowerline]

This is what Danny Kleinman (The Notrump Zone) recommends:

 

All super accepts should show a 4+crd support and a maximum.

3♣/♦/♥ not only shows a doubleton in the bid suit, but also shows a hand that is suitable to be dummy in a spade contract.

2NT then shows a super accept that still wants to be declarer in a spade contract. Over this responder can use natural game tries.

 

You don't need 3♠ as a super accept, but maybe you can have it show a 4crd support with a minimum...

 

Steven

[shyams]

I had this structure -- probably original, or probably inspired by something I read on some website -- that I never tested. I never had a partner who agreed to play it -- perhaps shows that the structure is not worth the paper it is printed on. Please note it is based on the assumption that we do not open 1NT with 5-card major and 15-17 -- this may be an unpalatable condition for many. Anyway, here goes:

 

After 1NT - 2H:

2S - normal accept

2NT - superaccept in S. Some 4-4-3-2 hand (4-card S assured)

3C - 5-card club; 3 card spade; max hand (club suit will not be awful). i.e. 5-3-3-2 hand

3D - 5-card diamond; 3 card spade; max hand (diamond suit will not be awful)

3S - Max balanced hand. Exactly 4-3-3-3 hand (S support may be 3 or 4 card)

 

After 1NT - 2H - (2NT/3C/3D), if responder is weak OR wants to be dummy, responder rebids the transfer (3H) and 1NT opener is forced to complete

After 1NT - 2H - (2NT/3C/3D), if responder has enough for game and is OK declaring, responder bids 3S which can trigger off a shape showing rebid by 1NT bidder.

 

The same structure can work after 1NT - 2D, except the 2S bid needs to be used to show a max hand with 5-card diamond and 3 card heart (otherwise responder cannot re-transfer)

 

According to me, the weakness of the structure is the 3S bid (with 3-card support we are often too high) but my belief is that the structure works well without this bid AND (though I have never tested this), the 3S bid will be used by opener too rarely to worry.

The upside of the structure is that partnership can find 5-3 or 5-4 fit in minors at a low level. And these fits are assured double fits (major 5-3 and minor 5-4/5-3)

 

Comments?

[bluecalm]

I think bids which make you play on 3level when you are minimum are silly idea. There is a lot of value in playing at 2level instead of 3level, especially at MP's (because there hands where there are 7 tricks available matter). I wouldn't mind playing that only superaccept is 3M and it shows extraordinary hand for suit contract (with 4+support)

 

I believe the value of superacceptance showing side suit or xx is close to 0 or even negative. Telling them what to lead/don't lead is more important than bidding games/slam on specific dream values.

[kenrexford]

Well, you missed the one option that I actually play. (And, it's somewhat strange that few even seem to consider this possibility.)

I'd have thought that you'd be used to that by now.

 

I play 3♦ as a 5-card super-accept.

 

I mean, you are allowed to have a five-card majpr, and partner is allowed to transfer into that suit.  It does happen, albeit rarely.

Do you find it particularly helpful to know fo a 10-card fit rather than a 9-card fit?

Yes, the 10-card fit is particularly useful.

 

Suppose Responder has your average 5431. Opposite a 4-card super, maybe 4432 from Opener, Responder expects about a 66% chance that he can ruff twice in his own hand with the stiff, bringing the tricks from trumps up to six. If trumps split 2-2, anti-percentage, he might get two tricks from dummy ruffing in the 4-opposite-2.

 

If Opener, instead, has 5332, then there is a simple expectation of seven tricks from trumps 66% of the time.

 

So, the 5-card super-accept heightens the expectation that the stiff in Responder's hand carries full weight.

[ONEferBRID]

Ken said:

I play 3♦ as a 5-card super-accept.

 

Why waste 3D on the rare occurance.

Just have Opener accept with 4M when holding 5 trumps.

[Free]

Ken said:

I play 3♦ as a 5-card super-accept.

 

Why waste 3D on the rare occurance.

Just have Opener accept with 4M when holding 5 trumps.

Sure, waste even more space to gain nothing. What if responder has slam interest? Just stay low, keep more options open!

 

These days I prefer 2M+1 as my only super accept. After this, responder can still retransfer, invite light with a shortness, show slam interest, rightside the contract, show a second suit,... You may give away an easy Dbl after transfer ♥ (super accept is 2♠ here), but that's pretty much the only disadvantage.

 

In the past I played superaccepts showing a worthless doubleton. Was ok, although I never analysed the effects on opps knowing too much information, or if responder had crucial information to bid or stay out of game.

[mcphee]

When doing some super accept we do need to face up to the fact partner can be very weak. This is something to be concerned about more at pairs than imps I think. I have never agreed with the principle that 3 level jump in the major should be any NT with 4 trumps.

 

I like 2N as 3 max with 2 hi honors

3 of the major 4 + all side suits controlled

off suit 4 max and losers in suit bid. , do not care if it is 2 or 3 cards (i have not given much thought to 4 bad cards)

 

I feel this works well when reaching for slam or thin games.