Jump to content

raise partner?


rbforster

Your call:  

59 members have voted

  1. 1. Your call:

    • 2H wtp
      33
    • 2H eh
      15
    • P
      11


Recommended Posts

Pass looks obvious to me. That's what I did at the table because at MP's, the auction is not over if I pass. Opener is likely to reopen with something and then I will find out if partner's overcall was a "lead director in case they play spades or NT" or a better hand.

 

Actually, the auction at our table was different so the problem was different for us. Sorry for spoiling the problem.

 

At our table RHO raised diamonds so it was (1D) 1H (2D) and your turn. I passed.

The full auction proceeded profitably and we defended 3DX for +500 after

1D -1H -2D - P

P - X - P - 2H

P - P -3D - X

PPP

Edited by peachy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would always bid 2 with this.

 

Pass looks obvious to me.  That's what I did at the table because at MP's, the auction is not over if I pass.  Opener is likely to reopen with something and then I will find out if partner's overcall was a "lead director in case they play spades or NT" or a better hand.

Passing because you have a bad 6 count with 3 small trumps and a QJ in their suit is something I can understand and respect. But passing to find out if partner's overcall was a "lead director in case they play spades or NT" or a better hand makes no sense at all to me, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I play a style where non jump raises are sound, this hand doesn't qualify for it.

 

This style is very useful in weak fields so you know where you are, however it also lets the opponents know where they are and I suspect it won't work that good on serious fields.

 

NV I'd bid 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would always bid 2 with this.

 

Pass looks obvious to me.  That's what I did at the table because at MP's, the auction is not over if I pass.  Opener is likely to reopen with something and then I will find out if partner's overcall was a "lead director in case they play spades or NT" or a better hand.

Passing because you have a bad 6 count with 3 small trumps and a QJ in their suit is something I can understand and respect. But passing to find out if partner's overcall was a "lead director in case they play spades or NT" or a better hand makes no sense at all to me, sorry.

I am all for "raise partner" and "raise when you have a raise". With three working points in one K, only three card support, balanced hand, and worthless QJxx in their suit made me judge Pass was better and that a raise later - if given the chance and if it were right at that point - would be better because I would know more about the hands then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a wtp pass, but I'm willing to have my mind changed by good MPers.

 

Bidding seems a good way to shut them out, but it also seems a good way to turn a plus into a minus. You're likely on a misfit, since partner probably has spades, so our honors are not working and we're vul. LHO is going to come back in and now we may get out-competed but partner and I have much better ideas of what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the table I'd bid 2 without thought. Maybe it merits a little thought, but it's still right to bid 2.

 

If you pass in this sort of auction, you allow them easy, informative sequences like

 

  dbl-pass-1

 

  dbl-pass-2

 

  1-pass-2

 

Bidding 2 immediately makes it more dangerous for LHO to bid, and if he does bid it makes it harder for them to agree on strain and level.

 

The downside of raising is that partner may bid too much, but is that really a big risk? We have a doubleton and a king, and even if our diamonds are under the AK, they may still be useful as protection against being forced.

 

The way to make my diamond holding really useful is to get them to play 3. The way to do that is to bid 2 now.

Edited by gnasher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like bidding - mostly to deprive opener of several easy rebids (goes past 2D to clarify his diamond length) ... but I will admittedly not be real happy to see partner bid 3H because of his singleton diamond on the next round of bidding.

 

Pass could easily be right. But IF I'm ever going to bid, much better to do it now than to wait for it go X-p-1S back to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I polled a few experts I knew at Reno and they were strongly in the pass camp. One suggested that his panel of experts would be unanimous for pass, which might not be true but seemed to suggest it wasn't a "wtp" raise.

 

At the table, I raised and indeed this resulted in a plus turning into a minus. My raise encouraged partner to balance 3 over their balance of 3, both of which were off one.

 

(1)-1-(P)-2

(P) - P - (3) - P

(P) - 3 AP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is aware that for an overcall both your upper and lower bounds are much lower than an opener, right?

 

K, just checking.

Not sure exactly what you are suggesting, but over an opener you can bid 1NT forcing and give preference with 3 cards and a weak hand. Over an overcall you can cue bid with 3 card support and a good hand. So I think the two situations are not analagous.

 

Suppose you have agreed opening bids are 11-20 and overcalls are 8-17. I still think with three card support you should raise the opening bid with 7-10 and raise the overcall with 6-9. Because you have different ways of dealing with hands outside the range.

 

I agree with downgrading this to a pass though. I'll probably have to bid 2 later so could do it immediately to try and shut them out but partner will over compete quite often as our hand is so poor. And I think it will be quite hard to shut them out of spades even if I raise and I don't mind if they play three of a minor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I polled a few experts I knew at Reno and they were strongly in the pass camp. One suggested that his panel of experts would be unanimous for pass, which might not be true but seemed to suggest it wasn't a "wtp" raise.

 

At the table, I raised and indeed this resulted in a plus turning into a minus. My raise encouraged partner to balance 3 over their balance of 3, both of which were off one.

 

(1)-1-(P)-2

(P) - P - (3) - P

(P) - 3 AP

At my table 3DX was off two, but I don't remember whether due to misplay by them or genius by my partner (I don't recall brilliancy on my part; and I would remember if there was cuz its rare :) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the table, I raised and indeed this resulted in a plus turning into a minus. My raise encouraged partner to balance 3 over their balance of 3, both of which were off one.

 

(1)-1-(P)-2

(P) - P - (3) - P

(P) - 3 AP

What was partner's hand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...