CSGibson Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [hv=d=n&v=n&s=s5hkt86dt3ckq9865]133|100|Scoring: MP1♠-1N,3♠-?[/hv] Context is 2/1, matchpoints. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I'd try 4S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Having just read Ron Klinger's admonition in The Power of Shape to beware of hands where you're short in partner's suit, I pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I'd try 4S. ditto.... I guess playing imp style at mp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I am really tempted to pass here at MP. Actually I would. Not to sound like whereagles but it seems really likely partner has short clubs. I will look very foolish on some layouts, oh well, that's what MP is about right? ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I don't wanna go home yet the night is so young. Oh well, one for the road anyway 4S I just don't feel comfortable if I pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I'll pass at MP and hope pd can make it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I'll pass at MP and hope pd can make it. Or go down one less than the players in 4♠. I pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Chris you play precision! how is this even a problem?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted March 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Chris you play precision! how is this even a problem?! Hey Jeremy. Precision with one partner, but 2/1 with the other two active partnerships, and usually with casual games, like this was... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I'd just pass then. I hate missing games, but a plus score is a good score, and there's no guarantee even of a plus score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Looks like P>3N>4S to me. Actually you'd have a moderately hard time getting me to bid 4S at imps either, unless you have a realllly high standard for your jumps to 3S (yes, I know some of you do.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Not to sound like whereagles but it seems really likely partner has short clubs. More or less. Pard is expected to have about 7*(7/33) of the outstanding clubs, i.e. ~1.5 clubs. If he has 1, you're better off passing or bidding 4♠. If he has 2 you might get lucky in 3NT. mikeh would bid 4♠ here, so I'll bid 3NT. Just COZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 oops misread:( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcphee Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 This sort of hand really depends on the agreements of suit quality for the 3S jump. Some players count 15-17 HCP and feel the jump in the suit is ok, others prefer the jump indicates a decent suit. There is a huge difference between AJ8642 and AQJ982. I consider the hand facing the jump to be rather good looking at a K and KQ combination and playing imps would have no problem bidding 4. Pairs is just a different story and we need to face up to the fact that many will not play game so I think we need to pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I can stand having ♣KQ and hoping to be lucky, but we also have another King who has to fit, partner likelly has a shortness somewhere doesn't he?. mmm just realicing, this hand fits with the AQ10xxxx AQx Qx x from the other thread, and even then some people though it was too good for 4♠!. Good luck to those who wanna try game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straube Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I can stand having ♣KQ and hoping to be lucky, but we also have another King who has to fit, partner likelly has a shortness somewhere doesn't he?. mmm just realicing, this hand fits with the AQ10xxxx AQx Qx x from the other thread, and even then some people though it was too good for 4♠!. Good luck to those who wanna try game. That's because we're talking about the same deal ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.