How would you handle such a hand in 1st seat?

[gwnn]

what shows what you were saying? :) I don't follow. do you think "most" = "75% or more" is unfair?

[jocdelevat]

you said less than 75% will bid 2s so in that category will fit all from 0 to to 74% or beter say only 25% will not bid 2s.

I wanted to point out that I got the feeling that some advance -expert play think what is clear -cut for them it should be the same for b/i. Your first post looks like you got bugged by the poster question. That's why I said is not clear cut 1s or 2s for most of the b/i players. I hope I'm wrong.

I recognize that I always post those "clear-cut" problems because I'm not advance-expert and it is what I was thinking at table could be a problem. After I read the replies I realize or remember and I regret that I posted. Sorry for that.

[Aberlour10]

No reason to get excited. It is still B/I Lounge where many people read for which not all is "clear" , "obvious" etc.

 

Thanks for the replies.

[gwnn]

Well all I was contesting was your simple statement "most BI people would open 2S". I did not say most BI would open 1S. I completely agree that it is not a clear cut hand for B/I. I am sorry if I am being argumentative here. ;)

[rogerclee]

I completely agree that it is not a clear cut hand for B/I. I am sorry if I am being argumentative here. ;)

I don't?! I will take a 1K bet right now that at least half of B/I players would open this 1S. I will poll the BCD swiss at nationals if I have to.

[gwnn]

eh that bet I wouldnt take. 25-100 was a great range for me, 0-49 is not so hot.

 

edited