gwnn Posted March 2, 2010 Report Share Posted March 2, 2010 we just preferred, as a general rule, playing in 3NT whenever we had 5 cards in some sidesuit but 5m when 4. it sounds very rudimentary and fatuous but it worked actually well :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 No Frederick,PM changed the system because he felt that semi positives were more valuable. Please learn to read before responding with ridiculous irrelevant comments: I was talking about his LIMITED OPENINGS. I see that you are still both intellectually and lingustically challenged. Have you tried applying for a grant for special assistance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straube Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 No Frederick,PM changed the system because he felt that semi positives were more valuable. Please learn to read before responding with ridiculous irrelevant comments: I was talking about his LIMITED OPENINGS. I see that you are still both intellectually and lingustically challenged. Have you tried applying for a grant for special assistance? Free was writing about limited openers, not semipositive responses to 1C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 No Frederick,PM changed the system because he felt that semi positives were more valuable. Please learn to read before responding with ridiculous irrelevant comments: I was talking about his LIMITED OPENINGS. I see that you are still both intellectually and lingustically challenged. Have you tried applying for a grant for special assistance? Free was writing about limited openers, not semipositive responses to 1C. I am aware of this as unlike Frederick I can read English. Read my response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 No Frederick,PM changed the system because he felt that semi positives were more valuable. Please learn to read before responding with ridiculous irrelevant comments: I was talking about his LIMITED OPENINGS. I see that you are still both intellectually and lingustically challenged. Have you tried applying for a grant for special assistance? Free was writing about limited openers, not semipositive responses to 1C. I am aware of this as unlike Frederick I can read English. Read my response. In that case you should learn how to write as well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 Relays only help you in unobstructed auctions, Unobstructive auction after a strong club? I'm afraid I don't understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo81 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 Relays only help you in unobstructed auctions, Unobstructive auction after a strong club? I'm afraid I don't understand. I can't tell whether this is a sarcastic comment or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 Relays only help you in unobstructed auctions, Unobstructive auction after a strong club? I'm afraid I don't understand. I can't tell whether this is a sarcastic comment or not.Not at all. When my opponents open a strong club, I find that I hold, with surprising frequency, a 5-card suit or a 4-3 or longer distribution in two suits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.