Jump to content

GiB double negatives with 5 card support


allfail

Recommended Posts

Interesting -- this bug was caused by an error in the definition of 4, which precluded 3 from being considered as an option. In GIB's simulations, 4 was usually passed but 3 gave it a better chance to get to slam.

 

Anyone want to offer an opinion about what 4 should mean here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...