karlson Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [hv=d=e&v=n&n=satxxhaqtxxdctxxx&w=sjxhk9xxdtxxxxca9&e=sxxxhxxdaqjxxcqxx&s=skqxxhjxdkxxckjxx]399|300|Scoring: IMPp-1♣-p-1♥2♦-p-3♦-xppp[/hv] +300 lost 8 imps to the 620 in 4♠ at the other table Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 the bidding looks correct at any other vulnerability, at this vulnerability both are close to do something else, I might duplicate the auction but knowing partner is an agressive passer or a sound double I might act otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 South should bid 3♠. North's double is for takeout, isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I don't understand South's pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I don't understand north's double. These doubles normally show balanced hands and are optional, not takeout. A singleton is possible, but a void no way. I prefer either 3♠ or 4♣ to double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Looks like south forgot to bid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.