Stephen Tu Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [hv=d=w&v=n&s=sqxxhaxdaqxcakt8x]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv](p)-p-(1♥)-dbl;(4♥)-5♦-(p)-?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Dealer: West Vul: N/S Scoring: IMP ♠ Qxx ♥ Ax ♦ AQx ♣ AKT8x (p)-p-(1♥)-dbl;(4♥)-5♦-(p)-?? well 5♥ clearly commits to 6♦. Looking at the ♦K and the ♠A seems a bit light for 5♦ so after a 5♠ Qbid I might bid 7♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manudude03 Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I'll settle for 6♦, I don't want to discourage partner from bidding 5♦ on ♦KJxxxx and an outside card. To answer the title, I give partner a little rope, but not enough for a noose :). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlson Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I didn't realize 6♦ was cold opposite KJxxxx and an outside card. I would pass, obviously might not work very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkDean Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I would also pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 My inclination is to raise here, with an eye to the vulnerability. If the colors were different, partner could bid 5♦ on a wide range of hands hoping for a successful sacrifice when we have a minimum double, in which case our actual hand may be just enough for partner to make. But at red/white, partner should expect to have play for the contract opposite the right minimum double. This strongly suggests a heart singleton and at least one if not two useful cards. Something like ♠Kxx ♥x ♦Kxxxxx ♣Qxx is certainly possible, and partner could even have a seven-card diamond suit that wasn't good enough to open at the three level (especially if we don't play weak 2♦). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 raise, they have to find the spade lead if they have one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 6♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFormaini Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [hv=d=w&v=n&s=sqxxhaxdaqxcakt8x]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv](p)-p-(1♥)-dbl;(4♥)-5♦-(p)-?? Pass. The opening bidder is on lead. They almost certainly have the A-K ♠ (since if we are giving partner the ♦K and some 'other' card, there is nothing left for them to hold. If the ♠Q were the ♠K I would venture 6♦, but why risk an almost sure penalty looking for perfect cards? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Tu Posted February 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 FWIW, on the actual hand: If you pass, you probably get a boring push with 3nt at the other table. If you raise, you reach a slam which on the normal heart lead basically is on the club Q hook through the opening bidder, certainly not the worst slam I've ever reached. The club hook fails though. BUT:::- it turns out opening bidder has chosen to psych 1♥ on their 5=3=3=2 4 HCP.- this causes basically everyone else at the table to overbid counting on the missing 2 hearts he supposedly has (your partner looking at 3 small hearts stretched a bit more than usual, thinking you might not dbl again on some min heart-void/stiff hands where 5♦ can make).- it also causes LHO, with 10 hcp, to double 6d. This induces a change in lead, and a subsequent misdefense. When the smoke clears you are +1540 B) Maybe isn't a valid data point, but does remind one to factor in the possibility of 3rd hand favorable vul opp not really having anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I'm not sure what's going on, and even knowing what happens, I'm fairly certain 6♦ (at least) is the winning action. Partner's pass...5♦ sequence screams a missing spade card, and you need little more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.