Jump to content

Bridgemate scoring system


dcohio

Recommended Posts

In the UK we use Bridgemates for Swiss teams, multiple teams and knockouts. Is there some format in the US that is not conducive to the use of Bridgemates?

Do we use them for Swiss teams?

I think they have been used for Swiss Teams, but not much. The scoring programmes can certainly do it and they may well be used a bit more for Swiss Teams in the future. The reason I've held back from using them is because of the danger of mis-matches if there are scoring errors.

Doesn't the same hold true for Swiss pairs, where Bridgemates are always used?

The difference is that Swiss Pairs are usually scored a round in arrears, so there's time to catch mis-scores before the asssigned round starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference is that Swiss Pairs are usually scored a round in arrears, so there's time to catch mis-scores before the asssigned round starts.

But why are Swiss Pairs scored a round in arrears anyway (now that Bridgemates are available)?

 

I think it is pretty rough that the correction period is over before the players have had a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference is that Swiss Pairs are usually scored a round in arrears, so there's time to catch mis-scores before the asssigned round starts.

But why are Swiss Pairs scored a round in arrears anyway (now that Bridgemates are available)?

Smaller events, like the ones I run at the Young Chelsea, are now run using current assignments, but it does make it slower because we have to wait for the slowest table to finish before assigning, posting, and starting the next round.

 

At a large event like Brighton that effect of slowing down the game would be greater, and any scoring error would be unlikely to be noticed before the next round had started, and might require a couple of mis-match adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In team games here, captains fill out a slip showing team numbers and IMP margins, get it signed by the opposing captain, and hand it into the desk. If there is an error on the slip resulting in a wrong matching, we correct and re-match if possible, but if the next round has started we cannot correct the matching, but we do correct the scores -- and we instruct the players to be more careful in filling in the slips (or checking that the winners have done so correctly).

 

With a good Bridgemate program, you would play your boards and enter them as played, with N-S entering and E-W confirming. At the end of the set, the console would display results and how many boards were entered at the other table, and perhaps show IMP differences for boards completed. Once everything was done, you could go back to the home table and compare in the usual way and check the results against the console. Eventually all results would be in (or time would expire and unplayed boards would be scored as pushes) and the console would then display which table to go to for the next round. The pairs who ran out of time would have little or no time to re-confirm the scores, a just penalty for slow play... :unsure:

 

Round in arrears has always seemed suboptimal to me: don't we want the current leaders to play? The penultimate round leaders might never meet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once in Brighton Paul and I lost a match 0-20 because our one excellent score was entered the wrong way. We and our opponents got the wrong assignments as a result. Once in a multiple teams our team didn't qualify for a final because of the same thing happening -- our captain didn't check the results until after he came back from dinner. So if mistakes like this are a reason not to use Bridgemates for Swiss teams, they are a reason not to use them at all.

 

By the way, in the first incident the scores were not changed, because another match had been completed when our opponent realised what had happened. Naturally, I didn't like this, and didn't understand. Can anyone tell me a good reason for not changing the VP totals after the fact?

Scores being entered wrongly in Swiss Pairs is due mainly by Pairs siting the wrong direction. Pair x Should have sat N/S and V V, so the Computer thinks they have and you get a wrong score and subsequently Mis-matched. this could also have happened by manual scoring. Mainly due to 'Bridge Players' seeing a 'hole' at a table and sitting down.

 

Your Mis-match would/should have been altered ie you would get your 20 and your old opps get their 0 then the mis-match rules kick in your New opps get threequaters of their score + 5 VP's

 

Your OLD opps get threequarters of their score at the NEW table + 5 VP'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scores being entered wrongly in Swiss Pairs is due mainly by Pairs siting the wrong direction.

Hmmm .... at the club, the vast majority of wrong scores are due to the result not being entered correctly, typically they forget that the contract was doubled, or sometimes they enter it as played by NS instead of EW. An advantage of players seeing what happened at other tables is that they will usually notice the mistake when doing so. My guess is that some 5% of results are entered wrongly, roughly half of them are corrected by EW before confirming, the other half corrected during the review after confirming. The amount of wrong results that do not get corrected at all is probably slightly lower for bridgemates than for manual scoring or optical readers.

 

I wonder why this would be different at Swiss?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
It seems to me that the main Bridgemate site is not, itself actually selling Bridgemates. It has a list of distributors - form where I am, the UK distributors site has the pricing data. I assume it works the same in other parts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed some interesting enhancements:

 

Show player names at start of round. Have you ever wondered who you are playing? You rarely actually see it on a convention card.

Players can review and edit their scores. Hope that is an option!

 

Show Current Ranking. How many like barometer scoring?

 

 

I hope they will be using some of these machines in Reno, hope to see some of you there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show Current Ranking. How many like barometer scoring?

My 2nd nearest club has Bridgemates and a screen to display current position - the Bridgemates are excellent - the screen is far more of a distraction than anything - I like to sit with my back to it.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been around both machines pretty often. I was speaking about the Bridgemate II when I said I hoped they would be at Reno. We used the Bridgepad at the Chico Sectional recently and it went very smoothly as our TD was trained by Diane Barton-Paine who was their first TD-Demonstrator. But, surprisingly, she is now pushing either machine - just get them!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they will be using some of these machines in Reno, hope to see some of you there.

I'll be there Joanne. By the way, never really thanked you enough for joining our knockout team at the Portland Regional, we really appreciate you stepping in at the last 2nd to fill in for our sick teammate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...