Little Kid Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 [hv=d=s&v=b&s=sak62hat532dj4ca4]133|100|Scoring: IMP1♣- (1♠)- 2♥-(2♠)3♣-(Pass)- ?[/hv]Partner is a strong declarer. What will it be now, 3NT or go for slam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 4C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 "Slam", at least looking for it, so 4♣. A modest (albiet useful) xx Kx Axx KQJxxx looks like slam to me. Or Qxx x KQx KQxxxx. Many minimum hands make slam good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Or Qxx x KQx KQxxxx Josh, the opponents bid and raised spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Or Qxx x KQx KQxxxx Josh, the opponents bid and raised spades. They psyched. Ok I'm just dumb. But 4♣ anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotShot Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Opener should not have more than 1♠ and 2♥ (I suppose that 2♥ showed 5 cards). So his minimum hand should be more like: x xx KQxx AKxxxx But of cause 4♣ it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 x xx KQxx AKxxxx high level contruction as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 This thread is not for the faint of heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Partner didn't bid 3C just to affirm a minimum with real clubs, did he? The "I had to show my clubs weren't 2-cards" bid. I expect near S-x, H-xx, D-AKQx, C-KQJxxx. May be surprised with delayed H-support wanted to affirm good clubs first. 4C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Qx xx AKxx KQJxx, anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 4♣, not close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 I insta 3Ned when i saw this but th ecogood players are 4Cing so it mus tb eright i dunnoo wtfffffffffffffffff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulrich Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 I insta 3Ned when i saw this but th ecogood players are 4Cing so it mus tb eright i dunnoo wtfffffffffffffffff Excusing please, what langwidge is dis one post? I went to yrf College in Oxford, but understanding nothing of dis one. Ulrich is 100% bid 4C on dieses Hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 What's wrong with 3♠? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Kid Posted February 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [hv=d=n&v=b&n=shk6da975cqjt9865&w=st94hqj98dt82ck73&e=sqj8753h74dkq63c2&s=sak62hat532dj4ca4]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] We ended up in 6♣ off one, ♣K was offside and no squeeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Well not to point out the obvious, but bidding 4♣ is not forcing to slam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.