karlson Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 [hv=d=n&v=e&n=skqj8ht5dkcakj975&w=st96hakqj4dqj9c84&e=sa5h9876d654cqt32&s=s7432h32dat8732c6]399|300|Scoring: MP1♣-p-2♦-2♥2N-3♥-ppp[/hv] 2♦ was weak, and 2N was good/bad, showing a competitive 3m bid. NS play udca. T1: ♦K-4-2-9T2: ♣A-2-6-4T2: ♠K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 I blame 2D, the methods (2NT G/B after the weak 2D) and the spade king. I like the diamond 2 and the club 6 is flawless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 I blame 2D, the methods (2NT G/B after the weak 2D) and the spade king. I like the diamond 2 and the club 6 is flawless. What about the opening lead? Maybe a non-systemic ♣A followed by ♦K would show a singleton. Then we would still just manage 2 down: overtake the diamond, diamond ruff, club ruff, diamond ruff, spade switch to break up the squeeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 You missed 4 spade because you bid 2 diamond. Bad... But okay, hard to reach four spade anyway. You did not defeat 3 Hearts because you did not read partners marks or because you play the wrong marks. Worse..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 How do you make 4♠? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.