gwnn Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 KQxQJxxxxQxxx JTxAKTxxxAxxx 1♠-2♥-p-3♥p-p-p +1 when spades did not break 6-1. MP's all vulnerable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lobowolf Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 I have to confess, I kinda like the final contract. I'm guessing south's 14th card is a club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 oops. yes mistype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
655321 Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 North 100% for not bidding 2♠. 3♥ could be a fair bit weaker, I would also pass 3♥ as South. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 3H? Lol, I've been seeing this a lot lately, people somehow won't cuebid with a normal limit raise. This hand is a 2S bid even if the fourth trump was a club, that's how poor 3H is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 60% bad luck, 40% to North. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 100% obvious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlson Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I think that given that game will be pretty rotten if south doesn't have the ♠J or if someone's minors are reversed, there can't be all that much blame. I think north's 3♥ was heavy, but not out of this world, especially at MP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrecisionL Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 No blame, it is just the rub of the green. North's hand is not IMO a Limit Raise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 KQxQJxxxxQxxx JTxAKTxxxAxxx 1♠-2♥-p-3♥p-p-p +1 when spades did not break 6-1. MP's all vulnerable. fwiwnorth 60%south 40% north has easy cue.after an ambigious 3h free bid by north south has an easy 4h bid with 6h. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 My head is exploding from amazement. How is a 10 count with 4 trumps and a worthless doubleton not a limit raise? What do you people need for a LR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Not calling north a limit raise involves some, um.... SERIOUS downgrading. It's even a limit raise that allows another level of bidding before committing. I'm with jlalls, I just don't get it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Hi, I would have raised 3H to 4H, but I dont play MP very well,and Pass is ok, playing MP.North is certainly max for the 3H, happens. In the end this may have more to do with knowing each othersstyle than anything else.If North knowes, that 2H overcalls are solid, he will be more inclined to make a inv. raise, if South knowes, that 3H couldbe that heavy, he will be more inclined to raise to game. In the end you have two players, who were a bit conservative,maybe expecting to face a more enterprising partner. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jikl Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Funny hand, personally I would cue raise with the North hand. However I think a lot of people would find this bid more easily if North was already a passed hand, then noone would feel guilty about cue raising. Sean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I think that given that game will be pretty rotten if south doesn't have the ♠J or if someone's minors are reversed, there can't be all that much blame. I think north's 3♥ was heavy, but not out of this world, especially at MP.ah ha a sane evaluation that doesn't ignor(why is spell check on for this word) the previous bidding! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I think that given that game will be pretty rotten if south doesn't have the ♠J or if someone's minors are reversed, there can't be all that much blame. I think north's 3♥ was heavy, but not out of this world, especially at MP. In that case there would be now blame but still 3H would have been a terrible bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrecisionL Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Well, is the North hand worth a LR? Using Rosenkranz's concept of cover cards, the North hand has 3 cover cards KQ = 1, xx = 1/2, and Qxxx = 1/2) and is worth a LR. IMO the lone Qxxx and A of spades behind KQx makes me downgrade this close LR to a heavy raise. The J of spades turns out to be the key to the hand! Edit: Removed comment about 8-losers. It turns out that on a loser only based analysis game should be bid. :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 8 losers is normal for a limit raise. Besides, never underestimate the power of the 9th trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 It is obviously South's fault for having made some truly horrendous 2-level overcalls in the past which North so well remembers and therefore is it any wonder north underbids this time because remember what happened last time he cue bid with this hand.....????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Well, is the North hand worth a LR? Using Rosenkranz's concept of cover cards, the North hand has 3 cover cards KQ = 1, xx = 1/2, and Qxxx = 1/2) and is worth a LR. IMO the lone Qxxx and A of spades behind KQx makes me downgrade this close LR to a heavy raise. The J of spades turns out to be the key to the hand! I don't quite understand what you are counting, and I am not sure I want to learn Rosenkranz's concept of cover cards. But may I ask: Did you take into account that North has QJ-FOURTH of trumps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Lol what is going on?? Even if south overcalls some terrible hands, north is committing to the 3 level by bidding 2S or 3H anyways, so it doesn't really matter at all. Even if the cue has a wide range, that is much better than 3H having a wide range, since as jdonn says 2S gives you a whole level to investigate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.