Jump to content

Quick advice for defence.


OleBerg

Recommended Posts

I am going to face the following preempt:

 

2 = Weak in hearts, or strong something.

 

These bids are more or less defined:

 

X = strenght

2, 2nt, 3, 3 = Natural, limited

3 = Strong with spades, forcing.

3nt = To play.

4 = 5-5 in clubs and spades.

4 = 5-5 in diamonds and spades.

4 = To play. A decent hand fearing partner might pass a 2 overcall.

 

What to use 2, 3 and 4 for.

 

My own idees would be:

 

2 = Perfect takeout, limited.

3 = Preemptive.

4 = 4 spades and a long minor.

 

Comments? (And plz no rap for the 3/4, we can take that in another thread.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've been rather more detailed than I think you need to be. Essentially you're playing against a 2 opening which shows a weak two in hearts.

 

I'd just play:

- Everything above 2 is exactly what it would have been over a natural weak 2.

- 2 is a takeout double of hearts

- Double is a balanced hand, either too weak for 2NT or too strong for 2NT

 

If you believe in leaving nothing undiscussed, you could add:

- Pass and double is takeout but weaker.

- Pass and bid is natural but weaker.

- Pass and 2NT is both minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather play 4 as natural, chaces of the raptor thing showing up and being right are slim and if someone forgets its a big disaster.

 

Also X contains too many hands while 2 contains too few, standard is to balance those 2 more or less as gnasher suggests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've been rather more detailed than I think you need to be.  Essentially you're playing against a 2 opening which shows a weak two in hearts.

 

I'd just play:

- Everything above 2 is exactly what it would have been over a natural weak 2.

- 2 is a takeout double of hearts

- Double is a balanced hand, either too weak for 2NT or too strong for 2NT

Basically thats what I am doing.

 

My only real doubt is the 3 bid. Normally we would play it as asking for stopper (maybe not the best, just a general agreement), but I considered that preemptive might be better, but I was far from certain. The other descriptions was just so that the whole complex would be known.

 

If you believe in leaving nothing undiscussed, you could add:

- Pass and double is takeout but weaker.

- Pass and bid is natural but weaker.

- Pass and 2NT is both minors.

 

Thank you fpr replying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...