Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think there are 20 total tricks so 5 could lose 200 (or 300 or 400 depending on what gets doubled), or it could win 420 (or 120 if we double them), or it could win 120 (or 420 if they don't double).

 

So I think it's close. I hope I can pass in tempo, if I can't I bid 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5.

 

Good problem. Maybe both contracts are one down but a poor score could be unavoidable in that case anyway as they appear to have made the right decision and other pairs with their cards may not. It certainly looks like 5 will be right any time either side can make 11 tricks and that will occur fairly often. I would actually like to sit if partner doubles and bid if he passes but unfortunately don't have that option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5. I'd like to defend if rho has clubs but I don't know so I think I've got to bid. And of course partner is bidding with spade length, otherwise if he is bidding based on hcp why isn't he doubling.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abstain. Why did I pass last round! This should be partner's problem over 5 not mine.

 

Edit: Misread auction thought it was 2 overcall. Ok in this case I bid 5.

OK, so what would a double of the 2S bid show? Surely support?

Surely interest in defending and that you might want to double them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abstain. Why did I pass last round! This should be partner's problem over 5 not mine.

 

Edit: Misread auction thought it was 2 overcall. Ok in this case I bid 5.

OK, so what would a double of the 2S bid show? Surely support?

3H=support lr+.

3s=stretch raise

double=less than 3 in sp, but stuff --cooperative to maybe penalize.

2NT=available for whatever you want it to mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abstain. Why did I pass last round! This should be partner's problem over 5 not mine.

 

Edit: Misread auction thought it was 2 overcall. Ok in this case I bid 5.

OK, so what would a double of the 2S bid show? Surely support?

Surely interest in defending and that you might want to double them.

That's the classic meaning but not the only possible treatment. I have sworn to support doubles after 1M-(2M) for some time. It gives us increased precision when we have a fit, and I think frequency makes this treatment better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Partner may already have been bidding your cards when he bid 4. He assumes the opponents don't have a bunch of spades when they're bidding like this, so he's counting on you to fill out his suit. And then he may be hoping you have a fit for his minor suit.

 

You have everything he was hoping for, but no more. And as others have pointed out, he may have been stretching in his 4 bid. If you stretch any more, something's likely to break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"No" was ambiguous? You have a hand which would stretch to bid 2S after a 2-level overcall.  It has neither the shape nor the strength to volunteer at the 3-level.  Partner is supposed to have some vague clue as to what your competitive bids show.

hey this hand fits my definition of a constructive raise :D and that is all I promise when I bid over their michaels call. Consequently IMO this is a mandatory 2 call even if you are playing F1NT or semi F1NT.

 

and No was ambiguous because did it mean the K was badly placed or that you objected to a 5 call

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...