Just checking

[kenrexford]

Ken you are LOLing me. Sorry but what you are saying may be an interesting thought process but it's the opposite of winning bridge. And then you justify it by resulting?? And making a bad defensive play doesn't make someone an idiot or a moron, or we would all be morons every session we play. And if you want to say "we are" that just goes back to the point that that's what you should play to be happening here.

Well, I'll admit one huge foible. A common comment that I receive from one of my partner's is that I sometimes give the opponents credit for doing that which I would do on defense, when in reality they are just being an idiot. I sometimes undervalue the chances of a play being an idiot play rathetr than intelligent.

 

That said, I still think the parity idea makes sense here.

[jdonn]

I sometimes give the opponents credit for doing that which I would do on defense, when in reality they are just being an idiot.

Ah, the two ends of the spectrum. Idiot on the low end, what Ken would do on the high end. :)

[kenrexford]

I sometimes give the opponents credit for doing that which I would do on defense, when in reality they are just being an idiot.

Ah, the two ends of the spectrum. Idiot on the low end, what Ken would do on the high end. :)

Sure. Of course, a circle has no end.

[billw55]

a circle has no end.

You found the second foundation?

[pooltuna]

a circle has no end.

You found the second foundation?

Isaac who?