Winstonm Posted May 29, 2019 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2019 It's a shame the USA does not have an Attorney-General with as much fortitude as this British judge is showing: To the shock of the British political establishment, a judge agreed Wednesday that Johnson, the former Conservative mayor of London, should face trial for deliberately lying to the public. “It is alleged that the conduct of which the proposed defendant is accused was a huge lie calculated to mislead the electorate by using inaccurate and misleading statements,” District Judge Margot Coleman wrote in her written statement. The timing of this extraordinary case could scarcely be worse for Johnson, coming less than a week after he confirmed that he would run to succeed Theresa May as leader of the Conservative Party and thus British prime minister. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted June 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2019 Thought experiment: You need a life-saving surgery. Would you: A) Prefer to have a single-pay insurance and allow a government worker to make a decision for you based on predetermined protocols?B) Prefer private insurance and have CEO Stephen Miller chose for you, with his income tied to the cost of your surgery? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted June 7, 2019 Report Share Posted June 7, 2019 “In June 2019 the Earth will approach within [0.06 AU or 9 million km] of the center of the Taurid swarm, its closest post-perihelion encounter with Earth since 1975,” write UWO astronomers David Clark, Paul Wiegert and Peter Brown in a paper just accepted for publication in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. “This will be the best viewing geometry to detect and place limits on the number of Near-Earth Objects proposed to reside at the swarm center until the early 2030s.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WRtLHS82cA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted June 8, 2019 Report Share Posted June 8, 2019 Thought experiment: You need a life-saving surgery. Would you: A) Prefer to have a single-pay insurance and allow a government worker to make a decision for you based on predetermined protocols?B) Prefer private insurance and have CEO Stephen Miller chose for you, with his income tied to the cost of your surgery? Obviously you would have Miller choose for you. He has a half dozen doctorates from Trump University, the best money can buy. He might have several thousand doctorates that he bought at a fire sale when Trump University went bankrupt. You can't argue with an expert on nearly everything.... B-) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted June 8, 2019 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2019 Obviously you would have Miller choose for you. He has a half dozen doctorates from Trump University, the best money can buy. He might have several thousand doctorates that he bought at a fire sale when Trump University went bankrupt. You can't argue with an expert on nearly everything.... B-) You could be assured of one thing: the doctors would all be dressed in white. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted June 19, 2019 Report Share Posted June 19, 2019 From The Greens Are Germany’s Leading Political Party. Wait, What? by Jochen Bittner at NYT: HAMBURG, Germany — The emergence of the Green Party as a leading force in German politics is not unlike the flowering of the Serengeti after a rainstorm: What had been mere seeds one minute, hidden but full of potential, sprout overnight, so fast and so fully that it’s hard to remember how things looked before. After winning a modest 8.9 percent of the votes in the general elections in 2017, the Greens jumped to 20.5 percent in the recent European elections, scoring their best result ever on the national level. Then, in a poll last week, the Greens received 26 percent, topping Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union, which came in at 25 percent, and making the Greens the leading political party. Long considered a left-wing fringe group, the Greens are now in control of Germany’s progressive agenda — a fact that could reshape German politics for decades to come. The party began as a motley crew of Marxists, ecologists and pacifists. Over time, it made its way step by step into the mainstream; Joschka Fischer, who served as foreign minister and vice chancellor, came from the Greens, and helped cement the party within the establishment. But the Greens didn’t sell out; rather, their version of the political avant-garde helped form a new mainstream. German politics were once, and to some extent still are, dominated by old gray men and women. But it is the Greens, almost alone among the country’s political parties, who can speak with authenticity to and for the younger generations; among all but the oldest Germans, they come in first in the polls. The Greens have sprouted because they fit perfectly into a society in which unconventionality has become the norm. Despite the trends, no one saw this coming. The Green Party leadership seems the most surprised by the prospect of a chancellor emerging from their own ranks. Yet others are also wondering: What is behind Germany’s Greenquake? The first part of the explanation is easy. Last year, Germany witnessed the highest average temperatures since record-keeping began and the most arid summer most citizens could remember. It felt like a climate change turning point: After years of abstract talk, we were finally living through the new, ugly reality. The climate question is not just about angry activists worrying about the future of the planet: A majority of Germans today demand fundamental policy changes to confront climate change. Other parties have taken on the challenge as well, but the Greens have managed to make the fight against climate change their unique selling point. Still, the astonishing rise of the Green party has another, deeper reason. Maybe it is best described as Merkel dissipation syndrome. In the public eye, Angela Merkel, though still chancellor, has practically abdicated political leadership since December, when Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer took over leadership of the ruling Christian Democrats. It’s only in Ms. Merkel’s absence that Germans realize now how different she is from her party — an easy mistake, because she has led the center right since taking office 14 years ago. But Ms. Merkel did not stand for conservatism. In fact, she was the greenest chancellor Germany has ever had, driven by moral convictions, even as she did so with the air of a soberly rational physicist. Call it Merkelism. It took the chancellor only days after the nuclear meltdown in Fukushima, Japan, to announce that Germany would phase out nuclear energy completely. A similar impetus informed her decision not to close Germany’s borders in 2015 after the European asylum system broke down, and to allow in more than a million migrants and refugees. Determined yet empathic. Altruistic yet not naïve. Daring yet prudent, Ms. Merkel came to embody the self-image a majority of Germans craved. But it would also be fair to say that during her reign, the German people changed more than did the so-called people’s party — the nickname of the Christian Democrats. The public has become considerably greener thanks in part to her. Now with Ms. Merkel on the way out, the public is not going to stick with the Christian Democrats. The one party coming closest to Merkelism is — you guessed it — the Green party. But are the Greens really up the task? Many new supporters may soon feel disenchanted. The party, intended as an opposition force, will find it hard to digest its own quick growth and sudden burden of responsibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted June 19, 2019 Report Share Posted June 19, 2019 Good story: What Really Happened to Malaysia’s Missing Airplane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted June 19, 2019 Report Share Posted June 19, 2019 From another fascinating conversation with Tyler Cowen. This one is with Hal Varian. COWEN: Does tenure still make economic sense? It doesn’t seem to on paper, right? VARIAN: Yeah. I think it’s going to get more and more difficult because there’s now this big push for enlarging educational access. What does that mean? It means you have to have more capacity in the universities to handle a greater number of students. So you’re going to see a situation where there’ll be a variety of roles, not just professor tenured and professor nontenured. There might be people that are doing various kinds of intermediary activities as well. Say, tutors, is an example. COWEN: Last question. Let’s say a very smart 18-year-old comes up to you and says they want to have a career in both economics and tech, but they’re not exactly sure what they want to be. And they want advice from you. Other than the obvious, “Work hard. Go to a good school” — or whatever — what would you tell that person? They say, “I want to be the next Hal Varian.” In some manner. VARIAN: I would say get the basic skills down. Maybe that’s obvious. Get the coding down. Get the design down. Get the basic economics down. But then you really want to exercise your creativity. That is, don’t just take the first way of looking at something or the conventional way of looking at something, but try to step back and see what the bigger picture is. Now, most of the time that’ll be a big flop. But every now and then, you’ll hit something that’s new and exciting and novel, and, of course, that’s a great feeling to be able to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted July 17, 2019 Report Share Posted July 17, 2019 Some stuff for which prices have outpaced wages from Noah Smith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted July 17, 2019 Report Share Posted July 17, 2019 Thought experiment: You need a life-saving surgery. Would you: A) Prefer to have a single-pay insurance and allow a government worker to make a decision for you based on predetermined protocols?B) Prefer private insurance and have CEO Stephen Miller chose for you, with his income tied to the cost of your surgery? By now the entire world, or at least the entire WC, knows that I am 80. I have been genetically lucky and, despite various acts of personal stupidity, I still am in decent health. But over the last ten years or so I have spent more time with doctors than in the entire preceding 70 years. So I have some direct experience. The answer to your question is clear-cut, my choice is C), I wish to have significant control. I have found the medical community itself to be difficult to deal with, often not what I would hope for. Sometimes a person has to get pushy. When this occurs, then insurance issues arise as well. I have Medicare, and I have private insurance. Both can be bureaucratically frustrating to deal with, but Medicare has an absolute lock on first place in that department. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 17, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2019 By now the entire world, or at least the entire WC, knows that I am 80. I have been genetically lucky and, despite various acts of personal stupidity, I still am in decent health. But over the last ten years or so I have spent more time with doctors than in the entire preceding 70 years. So I have some direct experience. The answer to your question is clear-cut, my choice is C), I wish to have significant control. I have found the medical community itself to be difficult to deal with, often not what I would hope for. Sometimes a person has to get pushy. When this occurs, then insurance issues arise as well. I have Medicare, and I have private insurance. Both can be bureaucratically frustrating to deal with, but Medicare has an absolute lock on first place in that department. Unless you are part of the 1% of the 1%, choice C is unavailable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted July 17, 2019 Report Share Posted July 17, 2019 Unless you are part of the 1% of the 1%, choice C is unavailable. Everything is a matter of degree. I am not part of the 1% of the 1% , not part of the 1 %, not part of the 10%, but I have some control. I don't expect to have significantly more control, I would like it but I don't expect it, but I would resist anything that would reduce whatever control I do have. Having some cash on hand, far short of wealth, can be useful but it is not the only thing. There was an issue some eight years ago where getting a straight answer from Medicare was simply not possible so I said "Let's do it, if Medicare doesn't pay I will" We did it and Medicare paid. Other instances are perhaps less clear cut, but there have been many of them to some degree or another, often not directly about money. The self-confidence of doctors often far exceeds their ability. I would expect that just about anyone of my age has numerous experiences that they could bring up. Bureaucracy can lead to passive acceptance. When your health is at stake, passive acceptance is a very bad idea. Added: In case anyone thinks that I am being too critical of anyone, I have known doctors who need medical attention.If you go by what they actually do, it/s clear that they think as I do. Of course they have more knowledge to guide their actions, but act they do. They do not just go along with whatever happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 17, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2019 When your health is at stake, passive acceptance is a very bad idea. Having been a nurse, I agree wholeheartedly. My sister-in-law was recently diagnosed with colon cancer, and after the doctor said they had to wait for the biopsy results, I urged her not to wait and to find a surgeon immediately as the tumor would have to be removed no matter what. End story: she did and was able to schedule surgery within 2-3 weeks and is now recovering nicely with a 90% chance of no recurrence. But as far as govenment insurance decisions versus private insurance companies, I would rather have the weight and strength of the government on my side and a law saying I have to be accepted with pre-existing conditions than have some guy like Steve Mnuchin making those insurance determinations for me. I believe the problems you are describing are correctable within the Medicare system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted July 20, 2019 Report Share Posted July 20, 2019 From When N.Y.C. Is Your Gym: Meet the Athletes Redefining Fitness in the City’s Parks by James Thomas at NYT: The key to doing well in a pull-up contest is rhythm. Let the body set the tempo: the downbeat of the chin clearing the bar, the kick drum of tension in the shoulder blades. Keep that beat, that timing, until weariness sets in. This is how Leticia Duran, 29, wins trophies, and how she mustered her first 20 smooth ascents on a summer afternoon at World’s Fair Playground in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park. Ms. Duran was training for the 20th annual Pull-Up Park Jam, New York’s longest-running outdoor calisthenics competition. She has placed first in the women’s class for the past two years, leading the field through grueling sets of pull-ups, squats, sit-ups, push-ups and muscle-ups — explosive hoists above the bar. For Ms. Duran and the fitness-minded people who’ve built a community in New York City’s public parks, the Pull-Up Park Jam (call it the “Pup-Jay” for short) is one in a series of cherished summer events.“These people are special,” said Doc. “They’re not special because they were born with certain gifts. They’re special because they believe that if they continue to do certain things, they’ll be better.” At 64, Willie Washington is one of the regulars at Marcus Garvey, a park made famous by the seminal Bartendaz collective. Mr. Washington began calisthenics 20 years ago, seeking relief from the side effects of his arthritis drugs. “The most important exercise to do is the stomach,” he said. “You know why? The stomach involves everything. Walking, talking, running.”“There could be no one in the park who knows you. But once they see how much heart you have on that bar, how much you push, what you’re giving — they’ll cheer you on,” he said. “It does something to you. You catch goosebumps, and you push out that next rep.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 25, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2019 The 50th anniversary of Woodstock has been moved to Maryland - to be closer to Kenberg? :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aberlour10 Posted July 26, 2019 Report Share Posted July 26, 2019 The 50th anniversary of Woodstock has been moved to Maryland - to be closer to Kenberg? :D uffff. I had quietly suspected they move it to Disneyland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted July 30, 2019 Report Share Posted July 30, 2019 Good read: The Crane Wife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 30, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2019 From Paul Krugman: When social collapse seemed to be basically a problem for inner-city blacks, it was possible to argue that its roots lay in some unique cultural dysfunction, and quite a few commentators hinted — or in some cases declared openly — that there was something about being nonwhite that predisposed people toward antisocial behavior. What Wilson argued, however, was that social dysfunction was an effect, not a cause. His work, culminating in the justly celebrated book “When Work Disappears,” made the case that declining job opportunities for urban workers, rather than some underlying cultural or racial disposition, explained the decline in prime-age employment, the decline of the traditional family, and more. How might one test Wilson’s hypothesis? Well, you could destroy job opportunities for a number of white people, and see if they experienced a decline in propensity to work, stopped forming stable families, and so on. And sure enough, that’s exactly what has happened to parts of nonmetropolitan America effectively stranded by a changing economy. I’m not saying that there’s something wrong or inferior about the inhabitants of, say, eastern Kentucky (and no American politician would dare suggest such a thing). On the contrary: What the changing face of American social problems shows is that people are pretty much the same, whatever the color of their skin. Give them reasonable opportunities for economic and personal advancement, and they will thrive; deprive them of those opportunities, and they won’t. my emphasis 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 30, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2019 From Yahoo: Dozens of wealthy families in Illinois have reportedly been using a controversial tactic to help their children pay for college: They give up legal guardianship so the teenagers can claim dramatically lower incomes and earn need-based financial aid, according to reports from two news organizations published Monday. ProPublica and The Wall Street Journal each detailed the efforts in separate articles after uncovering dozens of applications filed by Chicago-area parents to financially divorce themselves from their kids over the past year and a half. As part of the strategy, wealthy parents allegedly file paperwork to transfer legal custody of their kids to other relatives, friends or even co-workers. When the transfers are complete — often during their junior or senior years of high school — students are then able to declare themselves financially independent on college applications. In one instance detailed by the Journal, a student whose parents owned a $1.2 million home only had to declare $4,200 in income from a summer job. That student was able to obtain about $47,000 in scholarships and federal Pell grants to attend a private university that costs $65,000 per year. The practice is legal, but the Journal notes that the Education Department is looking into the matter. The agency did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment. “It’s a scam,” Andy Borst, the director of undergraduate admissions at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, told ProPublica. “Wealthy families are manipulating the financial aid process to be eligible for financial aid they would not be otherwise eligible for. They are taking away opportunities from families that really need it.” Borst also spoke with ProPublica. ProPublica noted that laws in Illinois governing the transfer of legal guardianship are broadly written and that as long as the parents, children and the court agree, a judge can approve the transfer even if parents are able to financially support their kids. Almost all of the cases cited by ProPublica and the Journal echo language that says the new guardians “can provide educational and financial support and opportunities to the minor that her parents could not otherwise provide.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted July 30, 2019 Report Share Posted July 30, 2019 The 50th anniversary of Woodstock has been moved to Maryland - to be closer to Kenberg? :D No doubt! It will be at Merriweather Post Pavilion in Columbia. In the early 70s I lived in a townhouse that was walking distance from it. I have seen Willie Nelson there, and Lynard Skynyrd, and others. I plan to skip Woodstock 50. I was not at the original but anyway it seems to me that the original was something that you were there for or you weren't, and any attempted re-do should be scrapped. Lightning strikes once and, Stevie Nicks to the contrary, not twice. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 31, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2019 Deniers of Ron Reagan's coded racism beware of your claims: Ronald Reagan Makes Racist Comment To Richard Nixon In Newly Released AudioHuffPost Lee Moran, HuffPost 5 hours ago Ronald Reagan called representatives of an African country’s government “monkeys” in a 1971 telephone call with then-President Richard Nixon, according to a newly released recording of the private conversation. The National Archives released audio of the call between Nixon and Reagan, who was then the GOP governor of California, earlier this month. Nixon, dogged by the Watergate scandal, resigned the presidency in disgrace in 1974. Reagan went on to serve two terms as president in the 1980s. “To see those, those monkeys from those African countries. Damn them, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes,” Reagan told Nixon, reportedly in reference to members of the Tanzanian delegation dancing in the United Nations’ General Assembly following its vote to recognize the People’s Republic of China. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted August 13, 2019 Report Share Posted August 13, 2019 Bill and Melinda Gates will add 50% to amounts donated to local school projects at https://www.donorschoose.org/. Today only I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted August 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2019 NEWS IN BRIEFDamning Investigation Finds Jeffrey Epstein Left Unsupervised For Decades Prior To Suicide https://www.theonion.com/damning-investigation-finds-jeffrey-epstein-left-unsupe-1837208732 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted August 14, 2019 Report Share Posted August 14, 2019 Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang has mentioned automation and the resulting loss of jobs several times in his campaign. If you were fired, would you rather be replaced by a human or a robot? These workers have a surprising answer A study released this week of 2,000 people by researchers at the Technical University of Munich and Erasmus University in Rotterdam is putting a twist on people’s fears of automation that are creeping into the workplace. When participants were asked if they wanted a human or a robot to take their job, 60% of participants said they’d actually prefer to be replaced by a robot instead of a human being. In fact, they felt the same way about being replaced by artificial intelligence. And yet another part of the study gauged reactions to a theoretical firm that costs either with replacement employees or robots: 67% opted for new employees. They want people to have jobs, just not if one of them is filling their role if they get fired. The researchers have a simple explanation: Ego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted August 14, 2019 Report Share Posted August 14, 2019 --- Moved to Has U.S. Democracy Been Trumped? thread --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.