MarkDean Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Playing 2/1, how would you take this double without discussion? 1♥ (P) 1NT (P)2♣ (P) 2♥ (2♠) x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Penalty, gwnn's law. So maybe 3514 with extras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I think 5422 is more likelly, of the kidn of do whatever you want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I think 5422 is more likelly, of the kidn of do whatever you want. nevertheless highly suggestive of penalty :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 agree w/ josh :) how about 4522? surely could be. don't pull if you have more than 4 hcp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 4513, 4522, with decent opening bid3514 with extras.Any of the above would not open strong nt (maybe :)) Informative double --informing partner that the opps might have made a mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Dbl = they made a mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Penalty, gwnn's law. So maybe 3514 with extras. pfft, gwnn was quoting me when he said it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?sho...ndpost&p=412313 ? :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 yep that was the string. Now Justin will find an older string where he said it first :) But "Gwnn's Law" sounds better anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.