Ant590 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 (3♦) - pass - (3NT) - dbl*(pass) - pass (4♦) - pass?* t/o diamonds Two quick questions1) Should dbl be a t/o or is just "values" better2) Should pass be forcing here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I think a forcing pass here makes sense but with an unknown p I would assume non-forcing. If pass is non-forcing, dbl is t/o. I just got a great idea: if pass is forcing, dbl could be played as t/o with longer spades than hearts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 if pass is forcing double is best used as " we are slaughting this" :). Wich is the normal meaning if pass is frocing. This is a rare sequence so you dhould just do what your meta-agreements say. Mines would be awful here :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant590 Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 This is a rare sequence so you dhould just do what your meta-agreements say. Our meta-rule says that this is a FP situation, for a t/o double has been converted. However, we weren't 100% sure that such "psyche-revealing" doubles should not set up a forcing pass. How off the wall is this? Would people play a FP in analogous but lower level psyche-reveal auctions? (1♣) - dbl - (1♠) - dbl(2♣) - ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 yeah, you don't double 1♠ on nothing, I think you are forcing to play 2♠ unless you prefer to double 2♣. Playing the other way makes sense as well, but I don't like exceptions. MY father and his partner used to play some funny thing: forcing passes only happen at even levels, so at the 2&4 level pass is foricng but at the 3&5 level pass is not forcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Hi, #1 values#2 no With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 <snip>However, we weren't 100% sure that such "psyche-revealing" doubles should not set up a forcing pass.<snip> Who said, that 3NT was psych? 3NT is certainly a common psych bid, but sometimes you will have reasonable diamond support, feeling that 3NT has a reasonable chance, but dont want toplay 3NTx. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I think that whether you categorize the run to 4♦ as "psych revealing" or not is irrelevant. Partner passed 3NTX, so you are now in a forcing pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.