raist Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 your hand is KQxxxx-xxxQxxx bidding goes (no interference)1H-1S2D now do you prefer to rebid 2S or pass 2D? and why?what are the things to consider?if it matters, scoring is IMPs and all vul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 2♠, on grounds pard can have 2 or 3 spades, which is (I think) more likely than him having 5 diamonds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 2S, not only do I think it rates to be a better partial than 2D by far if the auction were to always end, I also think we might often make 4S if partner is going to try for it. If he bids 3H I might regret this...or I might not...but that's one scenario. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 your hand is KQxxxx-xxxQxxx bidding goes (no interference)1H-1S2D now do you prefer to rebid 2S or pass 2D? and why?what are the things to consider?if it matters, scoring is IMPs and all vul I think 2♠ is your best choice because a) with 3541 your partner may be able to make a game try :) with a 7 card fit (4-3♦ or 6-1♠) the hand will play better with the longer suit holding as well as the weaker hand c) partner is more likely to hold x54y than x55y and 0544 is much more unlikely since partner might have called 2♣. I think this "logic :) " would apply to either MP or IMPS. For MP a 6x4y might be tougher to choose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTSummit Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 2S can't be bad choice, your partner has at least 1 spade (otherwise he would have bid 2C or 2H) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 (edited) 2S can't be bad choice, your partner has at least 1 spade (otherwise he would have bid 2C or 2H) Unless he was 0553 or (depending on strength and agreements) 0643. Edited December 20, 2009 by gnasher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTSummit Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 2S can't be bad choice, your partner has at least 1 spade (otherwise he would have bid 2C or 2H) Unless he was 0553 ah nice spot on, but he would probably bid 3D, it won't hurt :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 2S can't be bad choice, your partner has at least 1 spade (otherwise he would have bid 2C or 2H) Unless he was 0553 ah nice spot on, but he would probably bid 3D, it won't hurt :)no he won't.....not without a good hand.... with most 0=5=5=3 hands he will and should pass...when misfits loom, stop bidding....is often the best advice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bftboy Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 2♠ at IMPs, game is still possible, and worth a small minus to explore it. At MPs, I'd think about passing to protect a plus score, but I'd still bid 2 ♠. Game is still possible, and if the hand makes 90 or 110 in ♦, perhaps it will make 110 or 140 in ♠. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 2♠, wtp? If we have game, it's surely in spades, but there's a more important point here. This hand might be essentially worthless as dummy in 2♦, beyond xxx of trumps. It might not take a single trick, whereas opener will surely have some tricks for 2♠. Not hard to come up with layouts where 2♦ is down, with 8, 9, maybe even 10 tricks in ♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 2S. I have 6 of them, if p finds a 3S bid, I am happy. The adv. of 2S is, that it keeps the bidding open, allowing you tofind game (4S), if p is max. for his call.Game is more likely, if you play a style, where you dont regular raise responders major with 3 card support, if you do, the chancesthat p happens to hold 3 spades are lowered. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 I'll bid 2♠ at any form of scoring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 with most 0=5=5=3 hands he will and should pass...when misfits loom, stop bidding....is often the best advice. Carrying a good idea too far. Maybe carry it even farther and pass 2D?? 2S is right. Partner then bidding 3D with 0553 is expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 with most 0=5=5=3 hands he will and should pass...when misfits loom, stop bidding....is often the best advice. Carrying a good idea too far. Maybe carry it even farther and pass 2D?? 2S is right. Partner then bidding 3D with 0553 is expected. If he has extras. If he has a minimum it's both suicidal (for all he knows we will have to bid a frustrated 3♠), and makes it impossible to effectively show extras if you have them (without using 3♣ which then can't be used for other purposes). Of course passing 2♦ out of fear of a misfit is silly. We don't know there's a misfit, we may even have a 9 card spade fit. But when we bid and rebid partner's void after we had a chance to support either of his suits, HE knows there is a misfit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.