gwnn Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 if you are so curious, perhaps you should look at previous posts? say, the ones that preceded yours by 2 and 3 posts? I guess I'm blind... I still don't see the Responder hand for this post.I didn't see it earlier and I still don't see it . my reply wasn't aimed at you, it was aimed at billw55 post immediately above mine. (maybe you should have guessed that since none of the posts I alluded to have anything to do with responder's hand, but OK, I guess I have to quote all posts I reply to). Here's the full hand, and before anyone says it, I know I shouldnt be worrying about 50% slams.Looks like it's better than 50% slam to me.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mbodell Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Here's the full hand, and before anyone says it, I know I shouldnt be worrying about 50% slams.Looks like it's better than 50% slam to me.. Maybe, but it is a little tricky I think. There are 4♣, 1♦, 1♦ ruff in the short hand, 1♠ and 5♥ for 12 but that assumes hearts 3-2 and that you can work out transportation for all 4 clubs and the heart ruffs. Or read the position well enough to (again with hearts 3-2) play for clubs 3-3 or LHO with long clubs and ♠K or either opponent with long ♣ and long ♦ and plan on holding off on clubs until all the hearts are played and then over tacking the 3rd round of clubs which is, I think, the line I'd try. I'm pretty sure less than 50% of B/I make this slam, and am not sure I make it more than 50% either (although I guess in some fields the ♦A lead will start us off with many more chances). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 <!-- PARTNERSNS begin --><table border=1> <tr> <td> <table> <tr> <td>Dealer:</td> <td> South </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Vul:</td> <td> None </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Scoring:</td> <td> IMP </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> <table border='1'> <tr> <th> <table> <tr> <th class='spades'>♠</th> <td> Q753 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='hearts'>♥</th> <td> 953 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='diamonds'>♦</th> <td> K4 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='clubs'>♣</th> <td> A752 </td> </tr> </table> </th> </tr> <tr> <th> <table> <tr> <th class='spades'>♠</th> <td> A </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='hearts'>♥</th> <td> AKQ72 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='diamonds'>♦</th> <td> Q632 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='clubs'>♣</th> <td> KQJ </td> </tr> </table> </th> </tr> </table> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table><!-- PARTNERSNS end --> Here's the full hand, and before anyone says it, I know I shouldnt be worrying about 50% slams. after 1h=2h ...easy 3d..... now I think responder has an easy 4c cue. very tough hand to play in 6h. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts