Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Do I sound like mikeh when I say that aces are undervalued in the traditional point count? With a lot of distribution this is especially true, AJ10xxx Axxx - xxx is a better hand than, QJxxxx KQxx - QJx. I would definitely open that 9-count.

hmm, I would rather have the second suit. I agree with your general point but a hand with the same shape and 2 points less being better than the other hand with 2 points more is impossible to me (maybe not if you give one hand much better spots, but that defeats the point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I sound like mikeh when I say that aces are undervalued in the traditional point count? With a lot of distribution this is especially true, AJ10xxx Axxx - xxx is a better hand than, QJxxxx KQxx - QJx. I would definitely open that 9-count.

hmm, I would rather have the second suit. I agree with your general point but a hand with the same shape and 2 points less being better than the other hand with 2 points more is impossible to me (maybe not if you give one hand much better spots, but that defeats the point).

The Rubens Kaplan evaluator values the first hand 13.7 and the second 11.7.

I would not go as far as that, though this evaluator is good for suit contracts, but I would certainly prefer to hold the first hand and consider it stronger.

 

Rainer Herrmann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6-4 is a terrible rebid problem, IMO. Sure, you have an easy rebid, in that you have hearts, but partners have problems where the auction is 1-P-1NY-P-2. Recognition of this problem means that the rebid is not partnership-easy.

 

If I had a technique to handle this problem better, then opening garbage 6-4's seems easier. (Plug -- 2 rebid shows sound to extras; 2 rebid shows weak majors or spades and diamonds; improved with 2 opening 5/4-5 low opening so that 2 after 1 if diamonds+spades is stronger.)

 

Because of this, a light 1 opening with 6-4 is not that appealing to me any more. I think I'd much rather have 6-3-0-4, 6-3-4-0, 6-0-4-3, or 6-0-3-4.

 

Still undecided though. I by force of momentum keep opening these 6-4-0-3 hand light, but I like it less and less as the years go by, if tool-less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If partner has 6-9 HCP, 3 spades and no shortness and we play in spades then the 9-count takes 8.61 tricks on average and the 11-count takes 8.76 tricks on average.

 

If partner has the same shape but 10-11 HCP then the 9-count takes 9.5 tricks on average and the 11-count takes 9.65 tricks on average.

 

If partner has 12-14 HCP, 4 spades and no shortness then the 9-count takes 10.53 tricks on average and the 11-count takes 10.66 tricks on average.

 

11-count beats 9-count, shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pass your example hand.

I need a borderline for an opening and this hand is below the line.

And I have spades, so they need quite a lot bidding to make me quiet second round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd open the both the hands posted, lets raise the bar a little.

AKxxxx,Qxxx,void,xxx

 

9pt hands:

 

x....xx.......AJTxx.....AT9xx

 

really good dist, and honor location 5-5 6-4 or better, all your points in your long suits, good suit quality, holding a void, that sort of thing.

 

 

 

Sure I would opened that one, but of course I let partner know I would ahead of time. At our level I do think it is very important to come to some general partnership agreement on what the heck an opening bid shows. IF partner prefers a more sound opening style, no problem.

 

 

In any event I think we beg/int players need to practice our declarer play and defense more than worry about bidding. But it is alot of fun to discuss. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another one, do you open 2nd seat, V vs. NV

 

KJT985, Q9853, A8, void

I find this one really borderline...

 

 

First off lets assume we open ten often.....

 

 

we do not have 2.5 Quick tricks...not good.

 

We do not have two aces....negative....

 

 

we do have an easy rebid...positive....

 

we have 11 cards in our long suits ....positive.....

 

 

bottom line if you choose to pass..npp

 

 

OTOH if pard knows we open light often....npp/

 

 

I would vote PASS, but I though it was close....if we open light in second seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually in the last few months I started opening almost all 10 counts with a 6 card suit (even a minor, even if 6322) unless the suit is weak (I'd like to have KJ or better), and I must say it looks like a winning strategy so far.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually in the last few months I started opening almost all 10 counts with a 6 card suit (even a minor, even if 6322) unless the suit is weak (I'd like to have KJ or better), and I must say it looks like a winning strategy so far.

I've been having a lot of success with these and even weaker, distributional hands but wondering where the limit is or when my luck will run out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...