Jump to content

Notice of Thread/Post Moderation


inquiry

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Yesterday I removed two of the three new posts advertising bridgedailybulletins.nl, and locked the remaining one (since there was already a thread from the site owners last week). Today I removed one of the two threads asking when a hand from an old Aces on Bridge column was played.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Does anyone ever get banned on BBF? If so, I recommend to the mods that Scarabin be banned. Look through his volume of work, including his last awesome post to Vampyr that if he were her he would hope he would kill himself...

 

Seriously the guy adds nothing, constantly trolls and gets into flame wars, and says things like that. At least he's low volume I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone ever get banned on BBF? If so, I recommend to the mods that Scarabin be banned. Look through his volume of work, including his last awesome post to Vampyr that if he were her he would hope he would kill himself...

 

Seriously the guy adds nothing, constantly trolls and gets into flame wars, and says things like that. At least he's low volume I guess.

 

I gather that you dislike me and I can live with that but why vent your spleen on the monitors? They have shown superior courage and judgment, and also tolerance to your own peccadilloes.

 

If you wish to be fair then I suggest you re-read(?) the topic starting at Vampyr's first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just had a look at the thread, and as someone who makes a conscious effort to avoid flame wars wherever possible, feel the following:

 

1) Vampyr's first post, assuming no editing has taken place, could be at worst be described as lacking tact. It did not come across as offensive.

 

2) Scarabin's posts should absolutely warrant a ban. Suggestions of that sort have no place in any internet forum that I wish to be a member of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vampyr's first post, assuming no editing has taken place, could be at worst be described as lacking tact. It did not come across as offensive.

 

There has been no editing, and I admit that it did lack tact. Sorry to all for provoking the venom that has offended so many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone ever get banned on BBF? If so, I recommend to the mods that Scarabin be banned. Look through his volume of work, including his last awesome post to Vampyr that if he were her he would hope he would kill himself...

Just you and the ad spammers I think! But I agree wholeheartedly, messages such as this have no place on these forums.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just you and the ad spammers I think! But I agree wholeheartedly, messages such as this have no place on these forums.

 

Haha, actually think I was never banned from BBF, only BBO, but I'm not 100 % sure. That and lurpoa make me think that maybe no one ever gets banned here.

 

I gather that you dislike me and I can live with that but why vent your spleen on the monitors? They have shown superior courage and judgment, and also tolerance to your own peccadilloes.

 

This is the moderation thread. I am making a suggestion to the moderators. If they choose not to ban you then fine, but this seemed like an appropriate place to bring it to their attention, and also could potentially spawn a discussion on whether people get banned, and for what, and how far they have to go. I suspect it's more on a case by case basis, but who knows, that could be a useful conversation to have.

 

I agree the mods in general do a good job, that is why I brought this to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw I think the post about 'I would kill myself if I was you' is worthy of a ban on its own, but I don't find most of his earlier 'work' that bad. He even defended Sheri against someone else's trolling insults in Fred's thread about a good play GIB made.

 

I have no problem with the general idea of people being banned although there should probably be a suspension first in most cases.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw I think the post about 'I would kill myself if I was you' is worthy of a ban on its own, but I don't find most of his earlier 'work' that bad. He even defended Sheri against someone else's trolling insults in Fred's thread about a good play GIB made.

 

I have no problem with the general idea of people being banned although there should probably be a suspension first in most cases.

 

http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/56038-renaissance-men/page__p__672654__hl__ginsberg__fromsearch__1#entry672654

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experiences suggest that it is quite possible for players to get suspended from the forums.

 

It has happened to me at least twice, both times for being rude to Al_U_Card during global warming threads.

 

FWIW, I think that Scarabin is an idiot, a troll, or perhaps both.

I didn't see his most recent posting (wish I had) but I don't think that his original posts warrant a ban.

 

Then again, I don't think anything that I've done warrants a ban with the exception of a rather choice vindictive directed towards Vampyr which didn't result in anything, so what do I know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrible taste but I've seen much worse from a few posters. And he even said later in the thread it was incredibly stupid of him to start that thread. I wouldn't think that thread comes close to a ban. The only other post I can recall off my head that I would have thought should get the poster banned is a couple years ago when someone tried to start a thread asking which ethnic group should be eliminated to combat global overpopulation. That was one of the only posts I've ever complained to the mods about.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then again, I don't think anything that I've done warrants a ban with the exception of a rather choice vindictive directed towards Vampyr which didn't result in anything, so what do I know...

 

Yes, I was dismayed that "loathsome diseased cunt" was not considered ban-worthy.

 

Ah well, what can I say but it takes one to know one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I was dismayed that "loathsome diseased cunt" was not considered ban-worthy.

 

Ah well, what can I say but it takes one to know one.

 

Few quick recommendations regarding this line of argument

 

1. The expression "takes one to know one" concedes that the original expression was correct.

It's usually a fairly weak response since you're admitting that the original expression is apt, but the individual you're conversing with has no need to do the same.

 

You might do better trying to develop your own insults. "Tosser" is always a good starting point. Alternatively, if you prefer to target class, you might consider building from "chav".

 

2. You complain about my use of this expression fairly often. I've only used this once. You've complained about my use of this statement on at least three separate occasions.

I admit to being somewhat confused regarding your complaints about the characterization.

 

You can hardly object to language that you yourself use and you've conceded that the characterization is apt.

I suspect that some form of masochism is ultimately to blame, but its hard to diagnosis this sort of thing over the internet...

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...