Jump to content

Notice of Thread/Post Moderation


inquiry

Recommended Posts

Multiple post in the most recent Moscito article were deleted because of violations of TOS. Sadly, I had just lowered one of the people involved in the fracas WARNING level because he/she had been playing nice with post here for a long period of time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cmon, Ben, the other poster deserved what he got. He even accused one regular here of acting unethically. (Let alone that his defence sucks). The other guy appears to have a 'holier than thou" attitude and has not made a constructive post in years. Note no names mentioned.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the primary gains from your PPP (Personal Pet Project), the ability of your side to jam the auction in 2M, are threatened with oblivion (or at a minimum, radically reduced) you need to apply the flawless logic of Newt Gingrich: Shout louder!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cmon, Ben, the other poster deserved what he got. He even accused one regular here of acting unethically. (Let alone that his defence sucks). The other guy appears to have a 'holier than thou" attitude and has not made a constructive post in years. Note no names mentioned.

 

Pointing out why something is not a good idea, and the weakness of a method is fine. The points given in the thread are clear, and easy to understand. I find it partially amusing that so much effort was spent shooting down a very inferior method. The first or second shot at it was adequate to demonstrate the point. But the name calling, "I got to have the last word" approach was just silly. Any serious bridge player would stop reading the thread after Richards excellent gutting of the method. I did, only to then be dragged in by multiple report thread post and private emails telling me about the flame war that was going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Four forum-members don't like my use of the heart-symbol.

On the other side about 25 members, did let me know they like my lay-outs.

What is you opinion ?

Lurpoa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps four forum members who don't like the stuff in the posts mentioned that fact, and the others simply block it.

 

And if they didn't block it, they didn't bother to complain.

 

I'd love to see a poll. I'll give 10:1 against.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's time to give the anti-Lurpoa stuff a rest. She did her time as the black sheep of the forums for whatever happened a while ago and her upvotes and posts now seem harmless and mostly genuine.

 

That said, Lurpoa, making exaggerated claims isn't going to help things. Just use your hearts, we know you love them so much, and don't worry about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's time to give the anti-Lurpoa stuff a rest. She did her time as the black sheep of the forums for whatever happened a while ago and her upvotes and posts now seem

harmless and mostly genuine.

lol.

http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/55024-whats-your-bid/

http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/55285-six-bad-hearts/

http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/55206-playing-in-6s/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Okay, maybe I'm gullible, but it seemed to me that her upvotes were just because she liked the threads (for the OP upvotes) and agreed with or found the answers helpful [Added: whether they're objectively good/helpful posts or not is beside the point]. Are they actually super ironic/trollish upvotes due to all the history?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps four forum members who don't like the stuff in the posts mentioned that fact, and the others simply block it.

 

Yes, that is what I would suggest, those that do not like it: BLOCK.

So simple.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was just replying to the "her upvotes are meaningful" comment. I don't really mind anything she does or ever did, there are several forum members I would "handle" before bothering with someone who just doesn't add content.

 

Yes,

know that i used to comment a lot - always constructive and polite, nobody can tell anything else - but a couple a members - I will not name them now, management knows - started harassing me, just because I was using some !H symbols in my posts.

Do you think that is serious ?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...