Little Kid Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 NV (P)-1♣-(2♦)-X(P)-2♠-(P) - ? What does partner's 2♠ show? Does it promise any extras because I could just be weak with 5♥s or so? Or does it imply heart tolerance by skipping them? Is it forcing? What kind of major holdings and strength would you typically expect? If it matters, I held:♠AKxx♥xxxx♦xxxx♣x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 2♠ sends the simple message that you have 4 spades and minimum opener (12-15 for you) If you have a weak hand with 5 hearts you should pass, double should be bid from 8+HCP. If you have 8+HCP to double you need also to be able to cope with the most likelly responses form partner. Wich means, you either need to have 3 spades to pass 2♠ response, or 4 clubs so you can bid 3♣ over 2♠, or even 6+ ♥ so you can rectify to 3♥. If you have neither then you probably have long diamonds, just pass and collect your many downs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 NV (P)-1♣-(2♦)-X(P)-2♠-(P) - ? What does partner's 2♠ show? Does it promise any extras because I could just be weak with 5♥s or so? Or does it imply heart tolerance by skipping them? Is it forcing? What kind of major holdings and strength would you typically expect? If it matters, I held:♠AKxx♥xxxx♦xxxx♣x2♠ in this auction has the same meaning as the same bid in an uninterrupted auction 1♣ (P) 1♠ (P) 2♠ about the only conclusions you can say about ♥ is that he probably chose the better suit if he has equal number of cards in both otherwise I would expect him to have 3 or fewer ♥ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Kid Posted November 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Thanks for the responses. That's what I thought too, but both my p and an opponent at the table yesterday seemed adamant in thinking the bid is forcing so I started to doubt myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 2♠ can possibly be a 3 card suit, say with 3235 (this can bid 2NT sometimes) or maybe with 3145. Compare this if the bid was 2♥ which may now contain hands with 3334. But otherwise most of the time it definitely shows 4. Contrast this to 1♦-(2♣)-X-(P)-2♠, this definitely promises 4 as with 3253 or 3154 opener can bid 2♦ but 2♥ may be 3 on some occasions with maybe 3352 (weak diamonds) or 3343. Regardless, the 2M bid does not promise extras as opener should not bid 2NT with all weak NT's. The reason is because playing in 2M may be the best spot playing in a 4-3 suit contract rather than 2NT. And responder also needs to cater for opener bidding either 2M. But of course, everyone knows this is one of the murkiest auctions in standard since if you now have an invitational hand you may need to bid 3♠ and strain all the GF hands into 3♦. Preempts suck don't they. One suggestion IIRC reading, Justin had written something on 1♣-2♦ in his previous blog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Partner's double asked you to bid, and implicitly tells you that he can handle any response you make. If he doesn't have ♠, he should have ♥ and ♣ with enough strength for at least the 3 level, or a balanced hand with ♥ and a ♦ stop and enough strength for at least 2NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quantumcat Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 If you have both majors, or five spades, you can be weak. (With five spades you can pass 2♠ or bid 2♠ over 2♥) If you don't have spades, you have to have enough values to make an invitational 2NT or 3C (11 -12 HCP) Double means you are prepared for any response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Hi, the neg. X promised the unbid major, hence 2S doesnot promise add. strength.And it does not promise tolerance for hearts.P may still be 4333 with 12-14, but most of the time hewill be at least 44 in the black suits, but your guess is asgood as mine.. If you are broke with 5 hearts, there is still the option to pass over 2D. If you have 5 hearts, than you should alsohave 3 spades, not perfect, but most likely it wont be the first 4-3 fit you reached, and even if, than it wont be thelast. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 NV (P)-1♣-(2♦)-X(P)-2♠-(P) - ? What does partner's 2♠ show? Does it promise any extras because I could just be weak with 5♥s or so? Or does it imply heart tolerance by skipping them? Is it forcing? What kind of major holdings and strength would you typically expect? If it matters, I held:♠AKxx♥xxxx♦xxxx♣x Just a side comment: The neg. X is ok, but you are borderline for the call, most peoble would expect 8-9.Now: You are 4-4 in the majors, and your 7HCP are AK, so the neg. X is ok, but you are certainly borderline.If you have agreed, for what ever reason, that the neg. X. promisesslightly more, say 10HCP, than it could be argues, that 2S is forcing,mor precise, that the neg. X promised another bid. But that would be certainly not a mainstream agreement, and 2S forcingwould be, because 2S promised add. strength, but because the neg. Xpromised more. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.