Jump to content

Poll about evaluating ego


Would you consider that :  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you consider that :

    • you usually play better than others think you play
      17
    • you usually play worse than others think you play
      29
    • you usually play at the level others think you play
      38


Recommended Posts

Remembering a recent question about the ego of bridge versus poker players, I came up with this idea of poll. Sorry in advance if you find it nuts, but I'm rather curious about the results.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I go to tournaments I wear a shirt with patches from all of the bridge-related businesses that sponsor me. I also wear some very expensive sunglasses, because, you know, when they are trying to locate the queen on a two-way finesse, I can't give away any tells.

 

People think I'm pretty good. I try not to disappoint them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I go to tournaments I wear a shirt with patches from all of the bridge-related businesses that sponsor me. I also wear some very expensive sunglasses, because, you know, when they are trying to locate the queen on a two-way finesse, I can't give away any tells.

 

People think I'm pretty good. I try not to disappoint them.

cute. Are you really Phil Ivey, Helmuth, or Laak?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I go to tournaments I wear a shirt with patches from all of the bridge-related businesses that sponsor me. I also wear some very expensive sunglasses, because, you know, when they are trying to locate the queen on a two-way finesse, I can't give away any tells.

 

People think I'm pretty good. I try not to disappoint them.

cute. Are you really Phil Ivey, Helmuth, or Laak?

Gordon obv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is hard to tell what others think... unless they come right out and tell you. Even then it is hard to tell what they think...such as, what is their motivation to tell me what they think my play is like...or do they have adequate skill/enough data etc. to even make such judgment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have an A, B, C and D team for external competition so you can sorta rank people on the basis of which teams they have been asked to play in. Some observations:

- Some players seem to think that pairs who play different systems can't bid.

- Most players think men are better players than women.

- Some tell me they consider me a good player and that I could play for the A team if I got a decent p, but since I play with Manudude03 they haven't used that explanation since it would be too obviously false flattering. I bet they say to Manudude03 that he could play for the A team if he stopped playing with morons like me. Please confirm if you read this, Manudude03.

- If one player in a partnership always blames his p for bad results, other players seem to think that the blame assignment is correct, while IMHO in most cases it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have an A, B, C and D team for external competition so you can sorta rank people on the basis of which teams they have been asked to play in. Some observations:

- Some players seem to think that pairs who play different systems can't bid.

- Most players think men are better players than women.

- Some tell me they consider me a good player and that I could play for the A team if I got a decent p, but since I play with Manudude03 they haven't used that explanation since it would be too obviously false flattering. I bet they say to Manudude03 that he could play for the A team if he stopped playing with morons like me. Please confirm if you read this, Manudude03.

- If one player in a partnership always blames his p for bad results, other players seem to think that the blame assignment is correct, while IMHO in most cases it isn't.

Don't worry Helene, no-one has told me that!*

 

Anyway, I think people generally overrate me. I think it might have to do with the quality of the field. If you are the top of a weak bunch, the peers will say you're very good, but if you're average or a little below in some big international event, the peers will be pretty much saying meh with the standard being so much higher.

 

 

* I was recently told by some new-comer to the club that if I wasn't good enough for the A's, it must be that the A team is so damn good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for the middle road, because it depends on these "others" that you speak of. I know that there are some people that think I'm a way worse player than I am (because they played with/against me five/ten years ago or when I'm watching TV) or those that think I'm a better player than I usually am, because I've been unusually in practice when I played with/against them.

 

And there are those who make opinions solely based on stupid facts. Some of them include that I am a director (usually an upwards evaluation, sometimes (MATMAT) a downwards evaluation). Some based on the fact I'm a woman. Some based on the fact that I'm younger than many bridge players in my area (and look even younger than I am). And others evaluate based on who I play with (that they've seen). And that can go up or down depending on their opinion of the person.

 

So it's very hard to judge my skill level relative to what "others" think, because who knows what others think.

 

A more telling question may be asking about judging vs. some objective ranking, like masterpoints for ACBL players. Or tournaments won. Etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This used to be an easy question for me, back when I was a cute young thing - I was under-rated, because I was a CYT, and women are generally under-rated, and I played with some good players so if I happened to do well, it could be attributed to my partner. Now that I'm an LOL, I don't know. There's still some of the "women are worse than men" thinking, but I'm fairly well known, and I've won a couple of Open NABC titles, as well as several Women's & Mixed ones, and in my opinion I don't play as well as I used to, so I suspect I'm over-rated now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in contention for the local rookie of the year title when I first started and after some success, my team of 4 mates told me we could get so-and-so if I would dump my pard.

 

I dumped them (best move I ever made) and continued with strong tournament results.

 

I was considered better than I really am at that time but now that I'm finally much better, I'm considered worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This used to be an easy question for me, back when I was a cute young thing - I was under-rated, because I was a CYT.

It's all relative. You are still cuter and younger than me. Well, I am sure about the cute part :(

:) Thank you. Are you by any chance my husband posting under an assumed name? No, he knows he's younger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I go to tournaments I wear a shirt with patches from all of the bridge-related businesses that sponsor me. I also wear some very expensive sunglasses, because, you know, when they are trying to locate the queen on a two-way finesse, I can't give away any tells.

 

People think I'm pretty good. I try not to disappoint them.

cute. Are you really Phil Ivey, Helmuth, or Laak?

Gordon obv.

I don't know who he is, either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to play way better than others thought I did simply because they didn't know who I was. Now, even though I'm much improved over those days, I think I play worse than they think I do but that could be partially due to me always being very hard on myself. Also probably due to me having a very low opinion of all players including myself (essentially I think even the best players are bad at bridge, just less bad than everyone else).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you answer you usually play better than others think you do, does that show too much ego about your play ignoring what others think of it? And if you say you usually play worse than others think you do, does that show too much ego about your reputation thinking that your bridge is well thought of? A tricky question to answer evaluating ego.

 

Bridge is a game of mistakes, and the better you get the more mistakes you see in your play IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for better than others think I am just because of one lady at nationals who thought because I just had 5 points that I wasnt very good.

 

Story time. My p and I were wanting to play midnight knockouts at last Vegas national and were having trouble finding a pair. The director told us to wait around and he would find someone. A woman and her p come up to the desk saying they needed a pair and the director suggested that we play together. She then asks me how many points I have and say we both have about five. Her immediate response was "Thats it!". The director then said that we were young and played online alot and were much better players than the number indicated. She then decided to agree to play with us. We won our first round and lost the second by a slim margin. The last thing she says after comparing and seeing that we lost was "I am sorry I made a mistake but you guys played great." It was nice to hear but at the same time I wish I wouldn't immediately be seen as a poor player because of my low masterpoint total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...