Jump to content

Big


HeavyDluxe

Recommended Posts

I understand that you cant solve this problem if you only have 4nt here as rkc for so i bid 4 first and on partners next bid 4nt for real aces only. If this works at the table i would be very happy. :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&s=s2h3dakq43cakqj74]133|100|Scoring: IMP

3 - (p) - ??[/hv]

 

What would you bid? What would you do different (if anything) based on vulnerability?

well you are 55% that partner holds at least one of the major suit aces so slam isn't really a problem. I would start with 4 and over partner's 5 bid 6. Thinking about it more RKC could work out well just pass the 5 (see 0314 sometimes does have advantages over 1430) and bid 6 or 7 for the appropriate other response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&s=s2h3dakq43cakqj74]133|100|Scoring: IMP

3 - (p) - ??[/hv]

 

What would you bid?  What would you do different (if anything) based on vulnerability?

well you are 55% that partner holds at least one of the major suit aces so slam isn't really a problem. I would start with 4 and over partner's 5 bid 6. Thinking about it more RKC could work out well just pass the 5 (see 0314 sometimes does have advantages over 1430) and bid 6 or 7 for the appropriate other response.

Are you confident partner won't pass 4?

 

 

 

Natural forcing 4C followed by 4NT for me (direct 4N for me is RKC for spades). Will try 6C if partner raises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no methods for ace asking O_o

 

This is not one of those situations where weak fields make it easier for me. I really didn't find this situation before. Do you really have 2 ways for ace/keycard asking?

Yes. Not using 4 I understand of course, but what in the world other meaning are you using for 4NT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was actually watching this on BBO. N/S were a very strong pair (but I assume playing 'pickup') and I was just a little surprised at the result.

 

The person holding the 2 3 AKQ43 AKQJ74 elected to just bid 4. I'm guessing that there was no agreement re: what 4 or 4NT would be.

 

Here's the full deal:[hv=d=s&v=n&n=s2h3dakq43cakqj74&w=sak8hqj975d98762c&e=sqj7hkt864djtc653&s=st96543ha2d5ct982]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

I just thought it'd be interested to see what folks on here would agree re: the meanings of various bids over 2 and what your plan would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&s=s2h3dakq43cakqj74]133|100|Scoring: IMP

3 - (p) - ??[/hv]

 

What would you bid?  What would you do different (if anything) based on vulnerability?

well you are 55% that partner holds at least one of the major suit aces so slam isn't really a problem. I would start with 4 and over partner's 5 bid 6. Thinking about it more RKC could work out well just pass the 5 (see 0314 sometimes does have advantages over 1430) and bid 6 or 7 for the appropriate other response.

Are you confident partner won't pass 4?

 

 

 

Natural forcing 4C followed by 4NT for me (direct 4N for me is RKC for spades). Will try 6C if partner raises.

:) misread the auction I thought 3 was an opponents preempt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...