Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not sure if it is just me but with

 

....... KJx

ATxx Q9xx

...... xx

 

If they have 11 tricks off the top outside diamonds it does not matter who opens the suit up as they only need 1 trick. A low diamond would put them to the guess but its still as makeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it is just me but with

 

....... KJx

ATxx Q9xx

...... xx

 

If they have 11 tricks off the top outside diamonds it does not matter who opens the suit up as they only need 1 trick. A low diamond would put them to the guess but its still as makeable.

His point was that they will misguess 100 % of the time if you underlead your ace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the diamond ace is wrong and you play with a good partner the post mortem should be short namely : shrug, next please.

Of course we NEVER have any postmortem at the table. Actually, we never say a word and focus to stay pokerface all the time, especially when we double them into 2 making +1. But we DO have bloody postmortems at the end of the event :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a possibly interesting experiment I counted who was for dA and who was against and got in time order:

 

(diamond Ace-not diamond Ace)

  • 1-5
  • jlall's post (not counted)
  • 7-2

without barryallen and MFA relatively uncertain posts it's 1-4 and 7-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they had 29 hcp in between them. their diamonds are KJx in dummy and xx in hand, no discards. Nobody else bid this slam.

 

So basically it's like:

 

A ----> 0%

------>100%

something else---->50%

Unlucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they had 29 hcp in between them. their diamonds are KJx in dummy and xx in hand, no discards. Nobody else bid this slam.

 

So basically it's like:

 

A ----> 0%

------>100%

something else---->50%

Who underleads a Qxxx against this auction? I think small is still 0%, ok maybe 20%. Not leading a is definitely more likely to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free: no it's not, i actually asked RHO and he said he'd definitely have played the jack. Anyway last week I underlead a K against a slam and we took A and K and the players (all 3, plus two kibs) were like "wow! underleading a K against a slam! that's impossible!" so in this club they'd have played me for the Q 90+%
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free: no it's not, i actually asked RHO and he said he'd definitely have played the jack. Anyway last week I underlead a K against a slam and we took A and K and the players (all 3, plus two kibs) were like "wow! underleading a K against a slam! that's impossible!" so in this club they'd have played me for the Q 90+%

Sorry, but in IMPS, a small card away from a K or Q is routine vs a small slam for all good players especially if there is no indication that it might be setting up a side suit for declarer. Not as sure about MP but I certainly would where we need to set up a setting side trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which part of my reply are you contesting :lol:

he supported your view.

 

BTW I had lead a low club before Justin wrote, an ace after his comment and now:

 

A low diamond is the obvious expert choice, nothing else will be as often right as this lead.

 

 

..no, I had lead the ace and shrugged my shoulders after the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...