Simplicity Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 [hv=d=s&v=n&n=sqj62hq76dt86ca95&w=sa873hjt9d92cj643&e=sk94hk8dakqjckt72&s=st5ha5432d7543cq8]399|300|Scoring: IMPEW bid:P-2♦*2♥-2NT*3NT-P *multi 19/20 bal[/hv] This one isn't so much of an assign the blame but NS conspired to make declarers life rather easy: T1:♥3,9,6,8T2:♣3,A,2,8T3:♥7,K,4,TT4: Oh i have 9 tricks ♣K ... At trick 1 North didn't want to gift declarer a trick needlessly when he held Kx, while at trick 3 South felt that if he rose with the ace and showed his 5 card suit, the ♣K was sure to be cashed - declarer wouldn't finesse into the danger hand. Any crimes here? If it matters to you the opposition are unknowns in a one day swiss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhare Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 [deleted] -- read post wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Wouldn't north's first card be count if he can't (or in this case rightfully chooses not to) beat dummy's card? There is also north going up with the ace of clubs which I can't see a good reason for. So depending what carding they play, north gets some or all of the blame, and south gets none or some of the blame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 North, for rising with the ace of clubs. I'd feel pretty sick if partner had stiff ♣Q. If the case for rising with the ♣A was to keep South's club entry intact for the hearts, ducking works just as good when South knows how the heart is distributed (assuming North gave count on the 1st trick) as it will beat the contract when south has ♥Kxxxx or ♥Axxxx. But ducking caters for partner having ♣Q rather than king. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 raising with ♣A i sthe key if partner has ♣K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 raising with ♣A i sthe key if partner has ♣K That is true but you have to consider as well19+6 +9=34 so the K♣ and the A♥ will be hard for partner to hold notwithstanding upgrade arguments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 raising with ♣A i sthe key if partner has ♣K That is true but you have to consider as well19+6 +9=34 so the K♣ and the A♥ will be hard for partner to hold notwithstanding upgrade arguments you can give him ♥K ♣K as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Rising ♣A is playing for declarer to have exactly Kxx Kx AKQJx Q10x and that would be playing for 2 off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 raising with ♣A i sthe key if partner has ♣K That is true but you have to consider as well19+6 +9=34 so the K♣ and the A♥ will be hard for partner to hold notwithstanding upgrade arguments you can give him ♥K ♣K as well. If South has that then it doesn't matter who wins the first club because if South wins it first he can play back a heart to now declarer's blank ♥A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 raising with ♣A i sthe key if partner has ♣K That is true but you have to consider as well19+6 +9=34 so the K♣ and the A♥ will be hard for partner to hold notwithstanding upgrade arguments you can give him ♥K ♣K as well. If you believe that why didn't you put up the ♥Q at trick 1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 why cover 1 case when I can cover 2? ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simplicity Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I was North on this one. At the table I hopped the ♣A as I was worried that if South held ♣Q and took this trick he would be faced with giving declarer his ninth trick in ♥'s or blocking the suit - say declarer has Axx Kx AKQJx KTx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I was North on this one. At the table I hopped the ♣A as I was worried that if South held ♣Q and took this trick he would be faced with giving declarer his ninth trick in ♥'s or blocking the suit - say declarer has Axx Kx AKQJx KTx. I agree with you. You can pay off to stiff queen of clubs and otherwise not lose (if south wanted to finesse for the queen before he can still do so). However I don't think my point about the carding was addressed, that your first card should be count which would make untangling the hearts easy. What kind of count do you play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simplicity Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I was North on this one. At the table I hopped the ♣A as I was worried that if South held ♣Q and took this trick he would be faced with giving declarer his ninth trick in ♥'s or blocking the suit - say declarer has Axx Kx AKQJx KTx. I agree with you. You can pay off to stiff queen of clubs and otherwise not lose (if south wanted to finesse for the queen before he can still do so). However I don't think my point about the carding was addressed, that your first card should be count which would make untangling the hearts easy. What kind of count do you play? My first card was indeed standard count so South should have beeen able to devine the position. I think at trick 3 he just thought if i duck maybe declarer wont know what's going on in the hearts and that i have 5, so he'll finesse into my now stiff ♣Q Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I was North on this one. At the table I hopped the ♣A as I was worried that if South held ♣Q and took this trick he would be faced with giving declarer his ninth trick in ♥'s or blocking the suit - say declarer has Axx Kx AKQJx KTx. If declarer had that hand (presumably ♠A was K) then rising with ♣A already gives him the club as his 9th trick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.