kgr Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 [hv=d=s&v=n&s=skxhkq9xxdjxxxcjx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]You open 2♥ Muiderberg = 5c♥ and 4+minor and weak.Your partner bids 3♣ = game try (support for both minors)(Partner could hava bid 2NT to ask your minor, but any more bid from him would then be GF or slem interest).You have following options:3♦ = minimum with ♦ suit3♠ = maximum with ♦ suit3NT = not definedYou would open most 11 pts hands with 1♥, but you don't have much in your minor and you were Red (partner already expects better then min).What do you bid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OleBerg Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 3♠ When 3NT is the right contract, partner will bid so often that I don't worry. And that will rightside it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 3♦, that piece of junk may be 10HCP but I don't like the shape and the lack intermediates. Btw, that's a weird kind of Muiderberg responses you're playing there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted September 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Btw, that's a weird kind of Muiderberg responses you're playing there... All our agreements are weird. From the agreed bids why try to make the least weird bid at the table ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Hate to be "that guy" but we have TEN POINTS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted September 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Hate to be "that guy" but we have TEN POINTS! You bid 3♠ or 3NT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 If you'd ever consider this a minimum I would suggest that describing the 2♥ bid as weak is not full disclosure. 3♠. If I don't bid it with this might as well take it off the card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 You have a bid for this in your system, so use it. This cannot be a judgement call with max. on HCPs, a real good main suit and just the jack of clubs of questionable value. This is closer to an 1 Heart opening then to a minimum Muildenberg opening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 My partner told me that this is not a good hand when he invites for the minors and probably wants to go to 5♦. Too much points in the short suits.He thinks it is better to bid 3♦ (minimum with ♦) after having opened vulnerable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 [hv=n=sxxxhtdakqtcat9xx&s=skxhkq9xxdjxxxcjx]133|200|[/hv]2♥-3♣3♠-5♦2♥=Muiderberg3♣=invite with fit for both minors3♠=max with ♦(I'm not sure if my partner did bid 5♦ or if I did 5♦ over 4♦)The lead was ♠A and a small ♠ for -1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 how does your partner evaluate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 My partner told me that this is not a good hand when he invites for the minors and probably wants to go to 5♦. Too much points in the short suits.He thinks it is better to bid 3♦ (minimum with ♦) after having opened vulnerable. Did you tell your partner he invited game opposite a weak opening bid with a 13 count and a singleton in your main suit?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 My partner told me that this is not a good hand when he invites for the minors and probably wants to go to 5♦. Too much points in the short suits.He thinks it is better to bid 3♦ (minimum with ♦) after having opened vulnerable. Did you tell your partner he invited game opposite a weak opening bid with a 13 count and a singleton in your main suit?! He hoped I had less in ♠ and more in minors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 My partner told me that this is not a good hand when he invites for the minors and probably wants to go to 5♦. Too much points in the short suits.He thinks it is better to bid 3♦ (minimum with ♦) after having opened vulnerable. Did you tell your partner he invited game opposite a weak opening bid with a 13 count and a singleton in your main suit?! He hoped I had less in ♠ and more in minors I hope Jessica Alba is waiting in my car when I leave work today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Did I open 2♥ vul vs not on this hay? I don't understand this convention I guess, so abstain since I don't know what I promised with 2♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.