Adjustment questions III

[xx1943]

The following hand was played 4.25 tricks. East called me to adjust. He wanted to adjust to 3NT-1.

 

[hv=d=e&v=n&n=sat75hq8dt953cq94&w=sk6432hj3dakj72c7&e=sj9ht74dq864ckjt2&s=sq8hak9652dca8653]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

 

W....N....E....S

.............p....1♥

1♠..1N..p....3♣

3♦..3N..p....p

p

 

East leads ♦4

 

1. ♦4 ♣3 ♦A 3 won by W

2. ♦K 5 6 ♣5 won by W

3. ♦2 9 Q ♣6 won by E

4. ♦8 ♣8 ♦7 :) 10 won by N

5. ♥Q

 

 

Only 4.25 tricks are played, but 9 tricks are sure, maybe 10 if East feels squeezed and North guesses the situation rite.

 

My decision: 3NT made.

 

I would like to hear the opinions of our experts.

 

Thanks all.

 

Al

[inquiry]

First, if possible, i would issue a friviolous director call to EAST. On what is his basing his call to you? Sure his partner played horrid, but that is bridge. Second, I would rule making 3NT, at imps it matters not much.

 

This is a silly call and a silly request for a ruling.

[mink]

It is always ok with me if somebody request to adjust an unfinished board. I do not pay much attention to what score is requested, as I always look at the movie and decide on my own (sometimes wrong and players correct me then - sometimes right but still players try to correct me :). I would think here that the request to adjust to -1 simply was an error by the requester.

 

Deep Finesse says that there are only 9 tricks available. However, discarding is a bit tricky for E/W. Therefore I would adjust in favor of the fast players, if I have time to find out who was fast and who was slow. If I cannot, I shall stick to 9 tricks.

 

Karl

 

not an expert - sorry

[xx1943]

Second, I would rule making 3NT, at imps it matters not much.

Sorry my mistake it was MP-scoring. :rolleyes:

 

Al