Basic Carding Agreement

[Phil]

I've never had a clear answer to this one, either in practice, or from what I've read:

 

Lets assume standard carding.

 

Say you are defending 3N and partner leads the ♠5. Dummy is ♠T72 and declarer calls for the 2. We hold 983.

 

Let's say its a card combo where nothing productive can come from splitting our 9-8 here.

 

Is standard practice to play the 8? Or is it more useful to show count here?

 

I've always thought it better to show count to help pard differentiate from:

 

[hv=n=st72&w=saq65&e=s983&s=skj4]399|300|[/hv]

 

and

 

[hv=n=st72&w=saq65&e=s983&s=skj4]399|300|[/hv]

 

Agree?

[kfay]

No because I also play the 9 from 93. We can't play half-way double dummy.

[pooltuna]

I've never had a clear answer to this one, either in practice, or from what I've read:

 

Lets assume standard carding.

 

Say you are defending 3N and partner leads the ♠5. Dummy is ♠T72 and declarer calls for the 2. We hold 983.

 

Let's say its a card combo where nothing productive can come from splitting our 9-8 here.

 

Is standard practice to play the 8? Or is it more useful to show count here?

 

I've always thought it better to show count to help pard differentiate from:

 

[hv=n=st72&w=saq65&e=s983&s=skj4]399|300|[/hv]

 

and

 

[hv=n=st72&w=saq65&e=s983&s=skj4]399|300|[/hv]

 

Agree?

No. Either play the 3 or the 8