guggie Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 [hv=d=w&v=n&s=s7haqdk92cajt8542]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv] Bidding pass-pass-pass-1♣2♠(weak)-X (neg)-3♠-?? Full credits for EW for their annoying bidding. What now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 Seems like a middle-of-the-road 4C bid:Good hand, good Clubs, bad Spades ...what am I missing? Perhaps 5C? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 4♣... What else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 4♣ for me. This describes my hand the best.In MP 3NT or defend 3♠ could well be best, but to reach that you have to pass now. That's not really what I want to do with this hand. You can't have it all if opps preempt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearmum Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 4♣ no other bid to make -- and insufficient points to go to 5♣ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 This is matchpoints, how bad can dbl be if it is "takeout"? Your partner should avoid bidding ♥'s here without a fair five card suit, so if he bids 4♥, fine. If he bids 3NT, I guess I can stand that, something you can't get to if you bid 4♣. But maybe partner will pass, and we can collect a +200 for down two. If your double of 3♠ here is penalty, then of course, you are stuck for a bid and 4♣ is right. But especially at matchpoints, I like the TO double. If partner passes and they make? Well, I have gotten bottoms before. It is only one board. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guggie Posted June 13, 2004 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 OK, i hoped someone would show the way to end in 3NT. I bid 5♣, that made for 21%. [hv=d=w&v=n&n=sk83hj9543daj74cq&w=saj642hk62d63c973&e=sqt95ht87dqt85ck6&s=s7haqdk92cajt8542]399|300|Scoring: MP[/hv]My p and I discussed that X should show 3 hearts (?). But I like the suggestion of Inquiry. Would a pass do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 I can remember my mentor saying this: "Dwayne, when in doubt, double is for takeout. " Easy little saying :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 OK, i hoped someone would show the way to end in 3NT. I bid 5♣, that made for 21%. [hv=d=w&v=n&n=sk83hj9543daj74cq&w=saj642hk62d63c973&e=sqt95ht87dqt85ck6&s=s7haqdk92cajt8542]399|300|Scoring: MP[/hv]My p and I discussed that X should show 3 hearts (?). But I like the suggestion of Inquiry. Would a pass do? I don't think playing support dbl at such high level is a good thing. Usually it's played till 2♥, just in case responder has only 4 and no other bid available, to avoid the moysian 3-level game. If Dbl here shows 3♥s, it's a waste of the Dbl imo. Pass is wrong imo, you have a great hand, and if you pass, who says p will bid again? We have a great hand, we can either bid Dbl or 4♣ to show extra strength. Ben had a good point with the Dbl, however I wouldn't want to play 3♠*. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytoox Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 I will try 5C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 OK, i hoped someone would show the way to end in 3NT. I bid 5♣, that made for 21%. I think that you have to accept that when the opponents make a move that is contrary to the rest of the room, then there is an increased likelihood that you are destined for a non-average score. That may work either way, but also it may be beyond your control. On this hand the opponent made a highly risky 2S bid that was (I suspect) not matched by the rest of the room. He got lucky, finding partner with 4 card support. On another day your partner will have the QTxx of Spades and you may catch him for a substantial penalty. But since he got lucky on this hand it is unreasonable to expect that you can recover an average score. I would be content with 21% on this hand, and expect over 80% next time he does it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestro13 Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 Now for a reaction of the lunatic on the other side of the table! I heard my partner bid 5♣ and started to think about the fact that it was matchpoints and whether 5♣ would be OK enough. I had the ♠K, you know, and I thought partners hand would be good enough to make both 5♣ and 3NT with overtricks possible (though not guaranteed).Had my partner bid 4♣, I would no doubt have bid 4♥ to bring in the heart suit again, passing a retreat to 5♣ since partner now "knows" I have a weak 5 suiter in hearts.Would 5♥ issue the same message? I did not know but disliking not having tried for a better score in 5♥ or perhaps even 6♣, I boldly bid it.The effect was unwanted, we were overboard, and I interchanged a near-bottom with a bottom, but it was not uncalculated for. I wanted to protect my score and missed badly, but in my opinion I tried to lift the score to say 60 or 70%, not losing much if I were wrong. I guess I am too imaginative sometimes.... Can anyone comment on my wildly undisciplined imaginative matchpoint-driven bid of 5♥? Carpe Diem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 Hi, welcome to the forum Maestro :unsure: I would however not bid 6♣ with a singleton top honour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted June 14, 2004 Report Share Posted June 14, 2004 The question is: will partner take 5♣ as cuebid after you rectify 4♥ if you double 3♠? I doubt it, because if I had ♠ cuebid I would bid it, and If I had not I would bid 5♥ askign for their suit´s control, therefore there is no big risk on bidding double to 3♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted June 14, 2004 Report Share Posted June 14, 2004 OK, i hoped someone would show the way to end in 3NT. I bid 5♣, that made for 21%. [hv=d=w&v=n&n=sk83hj9543daj74cq&w=saj642hk62d63c973&e=sqt95ht87dqt85ck6&s=s7haqdk92cajt8542]399|300|Scoring: MP[/hv]My p and I discussed that X should show 3 hearts (?). But I like the suggestion of Inquiry. Would a pass do? I am a little wild bidder (if you search around, you will find a lot of wacky suggestions by me). But one thing I very much like is DOUBLE's are for takeout as long as 1) We have not established a fit, and 2) No conventional meaning is already attached to the double. This is a simple rule, and it goes all the way up to 7♠'s, I guess. Of course, as always, the higher the takeout double, the more likely partner will leave it in. This way, you don't have to worry about such things as negative doubles, responsive double, snapdragon double, support double, etc. A double is for takeout, call it that... "takeout" and you will do ok. So in this example, partner promised ♥'s with his takeout double of 2♠. If I have ♥ I don't need to double, I could just bid ♥'s. So here a double is directed towards the minors, or notrump... and as an added benefit, if partner is suited, he can pass. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 I would have bid 3NT directly at MPs, I suspect the sA or sK is in my pd's hand based on the bidding. Since it is MPs I try 3NT, can't be worst than a bottom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Dbl seems the best here.Dbl is takeout, it doesnt necessrily show 3 hearts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 I guess I'd bid 4♣. That carries the message: "I have clubs, and don't even think about hearts". Just about what you want to say. Note 1: I prefer bidding 2♥ instead of double. Double encourages pard to do silly things when holding 3 hearts. Note 2: a double on 3♠ is best played as take-out, with some 1345 or 2245 or similar shape, though I won't argue against it being for penalties. Note 3: unlucky that 3NT makes. Requires RHO to have exactly K or Kx of clubs. Not good odds. Under normal conditions, the par is 4♣= N/S +130. Note 4: opening 1♣ also opens a can of problems, as we've just seen. Open 3♣ and they'll hush up for good. A 4th seat preempt is not frivolous, so pard can still bid 3NT if he has fitting clubs and side aces/kings, something like Axx Kxxx xxx Qxx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trpltrbl Posted June 27, 2004 Report Share Posted June 27, 2004 X for TO. Hopefully pd can bid 3NT and if not I can correct his bid to 5♣, he must have some ♣ fit now. Mike :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts