shintaro Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Law 9 used to say, in part, that when someone has drawn attention to an irregularity, the director "must" be called. When I pointed out that the discussion in the Preface to the Laws regarding the usage of "must" implied that failure to call the TD in this circumstance should [sic] result in a PP "more often than not", the Drafting Subcommittee decided they didn't like that, which is why the current law says "should" instead of "must". I wish I hadn't said anything. :lol: Whatever "should" means in the local vernacular, the Laws say that it denotes an action which is illegal, but which is not often penalized* (although it will jeopardize the player's rights). *In the sense of awarding a procedural penalty - the lawful rectification will still apply. :o so tis all your fault then :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Yup. Well, not all — the WBF didn't have to change the law. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.