Humper Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Maybe forums like this (fori?) will help that to happen. Fora Heh. I used to say indices instead of indexes but I had to stop because too many people laughed at me :) Both are acceptable. I did have to yell at my graduate students, though, when they thought the singular was "indicee" (spelling unknown, this error only happened orally). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 I think the choice of opening 1C or 1D with a 4=4=3=2 hand can well be a "style" thing. I have a note from Butch Campbell at ACBL which says that this approach (one partner systemically opens 1D, the other 1C, when holding 4=4=3=2) constitutes two different methods and would not be allowed in ACBL. Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo81 Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 This is two different systems because you are allowed to play a lot of defenses against the 1♣ showing 2+ than you would be allowed to if it were 3+. Would I ever complain if a pair used this against me? No. It's a trivial variation, and these people are doing their best to disclose their methods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.