Jump to content

How High?


quiddity

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=n&v=e&s=sjtxxxxhxdxckqtxx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

1S-(2D)-?

 

This hand comes in the 4th quarter of a team match, with our team ahead by 12 IMPS with 12 boards to play. The opponents have been very conservative in their slam bidding, missing a laydown grand and a couple of good slams in the earlier quarters. Agreements here: 4C is a fit jump, 5C is to play, spade jumps are preemptive. What's your bid?

 

Second question: if you make a 4C fit jump, LHO doubles (alerted as a "good" diamond raise), partner bids 4S, and RHO bids 5D. What's your followup strategy if partner's 4S showed extra offense, and what would be your strategy if you weren't sure what 4S showed? If the opponents continue with diamonds, when do you start passing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 is perfect and I would bid 5 over 5 here with 6 trump. Over 6, I'll leave the decision to partner.

 

It might be right to pass 5, and you need to discuss if this is forcing or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 is perfect and I would bid 5 over 5 here with 6 trump. Over 6, I'll leave the decision to partner.

 

It might be right to pass 5, and you need to discuss if this is forcing or not.

agree with all the other things, except that 4C was perfect HERE Here, it gave the opponents more room and more ways of showing varies degress of diamond support. Doesn't make the fit-showing bid wrong --just not perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I like 5 - much better than 4 But I think on this hand it is not about consulting partner - how can he/she imagine you have such a distirbution - you must take control of the hand - if you bid 5 and they bid a slam I am bidding 6 on my own not waiting for partner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4 bid is appealing, except that it gives the opponents the freedom to act a level lower. I would have bid 4 immediately.

 

I would keep bidding through 6. For me, the problem comes at the seven level. Generally speaking, at IMPs, it is always right to bid one more than you think is necessary when both sides have big fits. The bridge literature is filled with hands where it is right to bid one more. And the penalty for bidding one too many on these types of hands is far less than the penalty for not bidding enough.

 

I don't agree with the 5 bid at the other table, although it worked well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4 bid is appealing

if you're going to keep bidding through 6 (which I agree with) why bother with 4 - I think it's only appeal is to wheel out a gadget - but that gadget is inappropraite with this hand

 

4 here would show a 10-card fit but you have an 11-card fit so 5 does not seem unreasonable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5S for me is preempt here. Especially W vs red. The problem is that competent opps will find any excuse to bid 6 as a semi-bluff. Still 5S should be your first option.

 

I find 4C awful. Its more likely to help the opponent then to help your partner. Add to that that it allow them to X, bid 4D,4H,4S.

 

Also if you lead your stiff H they have no chance to go wrong now. Against a 6D contract if opps managed to show a spade void a H lead from Hxx is normal.

 

 

a 3Nt psych has limited chance to work but its a freeroll situation so i like it.

2H might also work but i prefer 3Nt.

 

Pass and sac against every contract also make sense especially if youre not willing to bring back -1400. With a 12 imps lead its probaly the best strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...