Jump to content

balanced?


Fluffy

Recommended Posts

I play 3 is forcing sort of either a choice of games or something that has potential slam interest.

 

With an average suit AJ9 I would like partner to have some support to raise - I expect a raise with a stiff honour more often than not. Against this is the heart and club suits that I would prefer to get the lead up to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3NT, not 4S. The S suit will probably not play well opposite a s/t or void. The idea of "right siding" contracts can be taken to extremes and this is an example of this.

If you play 3S as forcing, this is what I would bid. I don't, but I play 2NT as forcing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3NT, not 4S. The S suit will probably not play well opposite a s/t or void. The idea of "right siding" contracts can be taken to extremes and this is an example of this.

If you play 3S as forcing, this is what I would bid. I don't, but I play 2NT as forcing.

oh so which of your 2 card suits is going to serve as your source of tricks in 3NT :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3NT, not 4S. The S suit will probably not play well opposite a s/t or void. The idea of "right siding" contracts can be taken to extremes and this is an example of this.

If you play 3S as forcing, this is what I would bid. I don't, but I play 2NT as forcing.

oh so which of your 2 card suits is going to serve as your source of tricks in 3NT :D

Probably the same suits that you are going to have to play on when you play 4S opposite a possible void.

I already stated that I personally have a gadget for this type of hand. Given that we are not using pet gadgets, 4S is a very foolish and unilateral bid. Even better is to downgrade the hand and bid only 3S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gazzilleah!  :P  Otherwise 3NT.  I don't like 4.

How do you show this hand with Gazilli. My version has 3 as forcing with all invites going through 2.

Start with 2, see what partner responds. After a 2 positive you bid 3 forcing (denying 3) and see what partner does. Note that for me this denies a solid suit.

Bidding 3 immediately shows a solid suit, sets trumps, and asks to start cuebidding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harald's auction is similar to the one we would have after a similar artificail response. I wonder if the 4S bidders will consider the 4S bid poor in light of the result? Was it really such a surprise to find short S opposite?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm rebidding 2NT, conventional GF.

 

With the actual responding hand we'd bid:

1 - 1NT

2NT - 3 (5+ in a minor)

3 - 4 (relay, 6 and max)

4 - 4

4 - 4NT

5 - 6

Is 3 totally forced? I would feel tempted to bid 3 spades. Specially if I can hold a balanced hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm rebidding 2NT, conventional GF.

 

With the actual responding hand we'd bid:

1 - 1NT

2NT - 3 (5+ in a minor)

3 - 4 (relay, 6 and max)

4 - 4

4 - 4NT

5 - 6

Is 3 totally forced? I would feel tempted to bid 3 spades. Specially if I can hold a balanced hand.

No, 3 isn't forced at all, opener can drop the relay if he wants, and might elect to rebid 3 with the actual hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...