TylerE Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Sectional hand #2 [hv=d=n&v=n&s=sqt8h983d3cq76543]133|100|Scoring: MP1♦ - (p) - ?[/hv] 1♦ = 1+ ♦, 11-15, 13-15 if balanced 3♣ would be a WJS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 pass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Playing Precision? Heck ya. 1♥ looks OK - maybe I can wriggle into clubs later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 How weak is 3♣ ? Almost certainly I will PASS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I won't pass and will bid something that I feel like. 1H, S, NT, 3C, who knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 probably 1♠ to get the most blockage possible for the level. 3♣ is asking to score -200 when all they have is a partscore and -500 when all they have is a game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Definitely 1M. Which one is a matter of strategy. Bidding 1♠ might tell opps where the ♠Q is, bidding ♥ risks that partner leads this. I think I prefer 1♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 roflmao. This is an obvious pass. If you routinely bid on this, your partner needs to alert your 1 level responses as being possible psyches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 pass wtp? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 roflmao. This is an obvious pass. If you routinely bid on this, your partner needs to alert your 1 level responses as being possible psyches. Isn't responding 1M with 3+M standard yet after a precision 1♦ opening? B) But ok, it's a little light. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 roflmao. This is an obvious pass. If you routinely bid on this, your partner needs to alert your 1 level responses as being possible psyches. I hope you are still laughing as much after your partner scores up -200 against nothing at matchpoints, or -500 against their game, in his 2-1 fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted August 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Actually, it was -400, with *-600* possible double dummy. So, it was against their slam. *In diamonds*. 3♣ would be either making or -1 depending on how sharp the defense is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bid_em_up Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Given that a WJS should show 6+ cards, <6 hcp, and you have a hand that is described perfectly by that bid, then that's what you bid (3♣). The "what if's" should never stop you from making the call that best describes your hand. If you are going to play this kind of "game", then you may as well remove the damn bid from your card. jmoo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.